Abstract
Conservation tillages of soybean planting are paid attention in Heilongjiang Reclamation Area,among which the typical method is the technology of no-tillage with maize stubble.From 2009 to 2010,the comparison of low input but high output between this technology and the plat plowing method were tested in Junchuan State Farm.The result showed that comparing with plat plowing method,the technology could give farmers the more comprehensive income by 1 467.91 yuan·hm-2through saving the cost for soil preparation by about 300 yuan·hm-2,such as no tillage,decreasing the amount of nitrogen by about 9.2 kg·hm-2and saving the cost by 18.4 yuan·hm-2at least and increasing economic profit by 1 149.51 yuan·hm-2.Technology of no-tillage with maize stubble,which not only adapts to the features of the ecology and agricultural production of Heilongjiang Reclamation Area,but preserves the construction of cultivated layer,increases the contents of soil organic matter and helps to decrease the occurrence frequency of diseases and insect pests,has become the most important conservation tillage in Heilongjiang Reclamation Area,and has been applied wildly in many large state farms.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage with maize stubble increased farmers’ comprehensive income by 1 467.91 yuan·hm-2 versus plowing.
- Taxon
- Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- comprehensive incomee0
- Direction
- moree0
- Value
- 1 467.91 yuan·hm-2e0
- Comparator
- plat plowing methode0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“comparing with plat plowing method,the technology could give farmers the more comprehensive income by 1 467.91 yuan·hm-2”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology saved about 300 yuan·hm-2 in soil preparation cost.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- cost for soil preparatione0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- about 300 yuan·hm-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“saving the cost for soil preparation by about 300 yuan·hm-2”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology decreased nitrogen use by about 9.2 kg·hm-2.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- amount of nitrogene0
- Direction
- decreasinge0
- Value
- about 9.2 kg·hm-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“decreasing the amount of nitrogen by about 9.2 kg·hm-2”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The nitrogen reduction saved at least 18.4 yuan·hm-2.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- coste0
- Direction
- savinge0
- Value
- 18.4 yuan·hm-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“saving the cost by 18.4 yuan·hm-2at least”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology increased economic profit by 1 149.51 yuan·hm-2.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- economic profite0
- Direction
- increasinge0
- Value
- 1 149.51 yuan·hm-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increasing economic profit by 1 149.51 yuan·hm-2”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology preserves the cultivated layer.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- construction of cultivated layere0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“preserves the construction of cultivated layer”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology increases soil organic matter.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- contents of soil organic mattere0
- Direction
- increasese0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increases the contents of soil organic matter”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
Claim · model-written summary
The technology helps decrease disease and insect-pest occurrence.
- Taxon
- SoybeanGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- No-Tillage with Maize Stubblet1
- Outcome
- occurrence frequency of diseases and insect pestse0
- Direction
- decreasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“helps to decrease the occurrence frequency of diseases and insect pests”
t0“Soybean”
t1“No-Tillage with Maize Stubble”
The same questions in other papers
Zea mays · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
Zea mays · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Zea mays · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
75 papers more in this group
See all 79 papers →tillage · soil: chemistry · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →tillage · pest · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
22 papers more in this group
See all 26 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.