Abstract
The ears were packed completely with white, black, red, yellow, green, blue food bags from 5 days af-ter silking(DAS) to 35 DAS, with CK. The effects of different colors light illuminating ear on yield and grain proteinof summer maize during grain filling stage were studied. The results showed that compared with the CK, all the treat-ments significantly increased kernel number, especially red and blue bag; dark limited increment in grain weight,white, yellow, green bag significant enhanced grain weight; different colors light improved ear traits, green(white,red, blue) bag increased in ear length(ear diameter, number of rows, kernels per row), and white bag significant re-duced grain abortion; red(blue) bag increased grain volume by 18.8%(27.6%), other treatments limited increment ingrain volume; white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein, but dark hindered absorption of nitrogenand protein synthesis in grain. Therefore, the change of light quality illuminating ear during grain filling stage im-proved ear traits, reduces grain abortion and increase in grain nitrogen, enhancing yield and improving grain quality.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
All colored bag treatments significantly increased kernel number compared with the control, especially red and blue bags.
- Treatment
- packed completely with white, black, red, yellow, green, blue food bagse2
- Outcome
- kernel numbere1
- Direction
- increasede1
- Qualifier
- especially red and blue bage1
- Comparator
- CKe1
Zea maysOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e1“compared with the CK, all the treat-ments significantly increased kernel number, especially red and blue bag”
e2“The ears were packed completely with white, black, red, yellow, green, blue food bags”
Claim · model-written summary
Dark bags limited the increment in grain weight.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e2“dark limited increment in grainweight,white, yellow, green bag significant enhanced grain weight”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
White, yellow and green bags significantly enhanced grain weight.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e2“dark limited increment in grainweight,white, yellow, green bag significant enhanced grain weight”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Green, white, red and blue bags increased ear length.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e3“green(white,red, blue) bag increased in ear length(ear diameter, number of rows, kernels per row)”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Green, white, red and blue bags increased ear diameter, number of rows and kernels per row.
- Treatment
- green(white,red, blue) bage3
- Outcome
- ear diameter, number of rows, kernels per rowe3
- Direction
- increaseinferrede3
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e3“green(white,red, blue) bag increased in ear length(ear diameter, number of rows, kernels per row)”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
White bag significantly reduced grain abortion.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e4“white bag significant re-duced grain abortion”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Red bag increased grain volume by 18.8%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e5“red(blue) bag increased grain volume by 18.8%(27.6%)”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue bag increased grain volume by 27.6%.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e5“red(blue) bag increased grain volume by 18.8%(27.6%)”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Other bag treatments limited the increment in grain volume.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e6“other treatments limited increment ingrain volume”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
White bag enhanced grain protein.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e7“white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Red bag enhanced grain protein.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e7“white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Yellow bag enhanced grain protein.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e7“white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Green bag enhanced grain protein.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e7“white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Blue bag enhanced grain protein.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e7“white, red, yellow, green, blue bag enhanced grain protein”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Dark bags hindered nitrogen absorption and protein synthesis in grain.
- Treatment
- darke1
- Outcome
- absorption of nitrogenand protein synthesis in graine1
- Direction
- hinderede1
- Comparator
- CKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Maize”
e1“dark hindered absorption of nitrogenand protein synthesis in grain”
e0“to 35 DAS, with CK”
The same questions in other papers
light · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →light · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
44 papers more in this group
See all 48 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.