Paper · 2012 · Journal of Changjiang Vegetables

Effects of Effective Microorganisms on Yield and Quality of Brassica napus

Jianbin Guo

6
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper studied the effective microorganisms of different diluted times on the yield and quality of Brassica napus by the pot experiment,and the diluted times were 200,400,600 and 800,with the water treatment as the control.The results showed that the effective microorganisms could increase the yield of B.napus and the contents of chlorophyll,vitamin C,amino acids and available phosphorus,and reduce the contents of organic acids and nitrate nitrogen.The 400 times diluted liquid of the effective microorganisms was most beneficial to improve the yield and quality of B.napus,and the concentration effect existed in a certain range.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganisms increased Brassica napus yield.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
effective microorganismse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
water treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effective microorganisms could increase the yield of B.napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
e1

“with the water treatment as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–226 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganisms increased chlorophyll, vitamin C, and amino acid content.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
effective microorganismse3
Outcome
chlorophyll,vitamin C,amino acidse0
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
water treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the contents of chlorophyll,vitamin C,amino acids and available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 320–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“could increase the yield of B.napus and the contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the water treatment as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“the effective microorganisms could increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganisms increased available phosphorus content.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
effective microorganismse3
Outcome
available phosphoruse0
Direction
increasee1
Comparator
water treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“available phosphorus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 374–394 · show in text ↑
e1

“could increase the yield of B.napus and the contents”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 280–332 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the water treatment as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–226 · show in text ↑
e3

“the effective microorganisms could increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Effective microorganisms reduced organic acid and nitrate nitrogen content.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
effective microorganismse1
Outcome
contents of organic acids and nitrate nitrogene0
Direction
reducee0
Comparator
water treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduce the contents of organic acids and nitrate nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 399–456 · show in text ↑
e1

“the effective microorganisms could increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–294 · show in text ↑
e2

“with the water treatment as the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 187–226 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 400 times dilution was most beneficial for Brassica napus yield and quality.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Treatment
400 times diluted liquid of the effective microorganismse0
Outcome
yield and qualitye0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The 400 times diluted liquid of the effective microorganisms was most beneficial to improve the yield and quality of B.napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 457–581 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A concentration effect existed within a certain range.

Taxon
Brassica napusBrassica napust0
Outcome
concentration effecte0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus
Brassica napus · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the concentration effect existed in a certain range”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 586–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“Brassica napus”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–74 · show in text ↑

inoculation · nutrient: content · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 31 positive, 4 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

inoculation · yield · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

47 papers: 44 positive, 3 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

inoculation · physiology: pigments · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · soil: chemistry · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.