Paper · 2009

Effect of Cultivation Factors on Oil Content in Rapeseed

Chunyun Guan

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of nitrogen,phosphate,potassium,sulphur,lemon acid and BR on oil content in rapeseed were studied by a Quadratic-Orthogonal-Rotation-Combination experiment in Changsha in 2005~2007.Analysis on effect of single factor showed a negative linearity relationship existed between nitrogen rate and oil content,and a conic negative relationship existed between oil content and rate,which showed that application of phosphate and potassium in a certain range was advantageous to improvement of oil content,while the excess application rate was disadvantageous.The relationship between sulphur rate and oil content was related to sulphur content in experiment field.In this study,higher oil content could be realized under condition of low nitrogen rate,medium phosphate rate and medium potassium rate.In 2006,the highest oil content,45.87%,was obtained when application rate of pure nitrogen,phosphate,potassium and sulphur was 0,112.5,112.5 and 60 kg/hm2,respectively.In 2007,the highest oil content,44.08%,was obtained at the same nitrogen,phosphate and potassium rate as 2006.Effect of BR and lemon acid was not significant,which was probably related to the application rate and period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen rate had a negative linear relationship with rapeseed oil content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
nitrogen ratee0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
negativee0

Verbatim

e0

“a negative linearity relationship existed between nitrogen rate and oil content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 232–311 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Phosphate application within a certain range favored oil content, whereas excess was unfavorable.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
phosphatee0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphate and potassium in a certain range was advantageous to improvement of oil content,while the excess application rate was disadvantageous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium application within a certain range favored oil content, whereas excess was unfavorable.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
potassiume0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
improvemente0
Qualifier
in a certain rangee0

Verbatim

e0

“application of phosphate and potassium in a certain range was advantageous to improvement of oil content,while the excess application rate was disadvantageous”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The sulfur-rate relationship with oil content depended on field sulfur content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
sulphur ratee0
Outcome
oil contente0
Qualifier
sulphur content in experiment fielde0

Not reportedDirection

Verbatim

e0

“The relationship between sulphur rate and oil content was related to sulphur content in experiment field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–664 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen, medium phosphate, and medium potassium yielded higher oil content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
low nitrogen rate,medium phosphate rate and medium potassium ratee0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“higher oil content could be realized under condition of low nitrogen rate,medium phosphate rate and medium potassium rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 679–800 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2006 the maximum oil content was 45.87% under the stated nutrient application rates.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
0,112.5,112.5 and 60 kg/hm2e0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
45.87%e0
Qualifier
In 2006e0

Verbatim

e0

“In 2006,the highest oil content,45.87%,was obtained when application rate of pure nitrogen,phosphate,potassium and sulphur was 0,112.5,112.5 and 60 kg/hm2,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–968 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In 2007 the maximum oil content was 44.08% at the same N, P and K rates as 2006.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
same nitrogen,phosphate and potassium rate as 2006e0
Outcome
oil contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44.08%e0
Qualifier
In 2007e0

Verbatim

e0

“In 2007,the highest oil content,44.08%,was obtained at the same nitrogen,phosphate and potassium rate as 2006”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 969–1078 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

BR had no statistically significant effect on oil content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
BRe0
Outcome
oil contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of BR and lemon acid was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“on oil content in rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Lemon acid had no statistically significant effect on oil content.

Taxon
Rapeseedt0
Treatment
lemon acide0
Outcome
oil contente1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Verbatim

e0

“Effect of BR and lemon acid was not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1079–1126 · show in text ↑
e1

“on oil content in rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 66–92 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oil Content in Rapeseed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 33–56 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results differ

64 papers: 31 positive, 33 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

potassium · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

phosphorus · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 11 positive, 5 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

in vitro · quality: oil · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.