Paper · 2004

Effects of waterlogging on the photosythesis of tobacco cultivars

Guo Chun-ming

9
claims
28
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Pot-cultured tobacco plants at twelve- leaf age were treated with waterlogging in July,2003. The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) were tested on the 1st, 3rd, and 5th days of waterlogging and the recovery growth of the 1st and 5th days after 6 days of waterlogging. Pn, Tr and Gs decreased evidently with the time of waterlogging, but Ci first decreased slightly and then increased remarkably. After 5 days of the treatment, the above four indices could not be restored to the control's level. The results suggested that the photosynthesis of tobacco cultivars could be seriously affected by waterlogging and the photosynthetic damage couldn't be recovered in a short period.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Net photosynthetic rate decreased with duration of waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Pne0
Direction
decreased evidentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn, Tr and Gs decreased evidently with the time of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Transpiration rate decreased with duration of waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Tre0
Direction
decreased evidentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn, Tr and Gs decreased evidently with the time of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance decreased with duration of waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterlogginge0
Outcome
Gse0
Direction
decreased evidentlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pn, Tr and Gs decreased evidently with the time of waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–419 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO 2 concentration initially decreased slightly during waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Cie0
Direction
decreased slightlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ci first decreased slightly and then increased remarkably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular CO 2 concentration subsequently increased remarkably during waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Cie0
Direction
increased remarkablye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Ci first decreased slightly and then increased remarkably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–483 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five days of waterlogging, net photosynthetic rate did not recover to the control level.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Pne1
Direction
could not be restorede0
Qualifier
After 5 dayse0
Comparator
control's levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 5 days of the treatment, the above four indices could not be restored to the control's level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–231 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five days of waterlogging, transpiration rate did not recover to the control level.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Tre1
Direction
could not be restorede0
Qualifier
After 5 dayse0
Comparator
control's levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 5 days of the treatment, the above four indices could not be restored to the control's level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–231 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five days of waterlogging, stomatal conductance did not recover to the control level.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Gse1
Direction
could not be restorede0
Qualifier
After 5 dayse0
Comparator
control's levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 5 days of the treatment, the above four indices could not be restored to the control's level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–231 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After five days of waterlogging, intercellular CO 2 concentration did not recover to the control level.

Taxon
tobacco cultivarsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterloggingt1
Outcome
Cie1
Direction
could not be restorede0
Qualifier
After 5 dayse0
Comparator
control's levele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 5 days of the treatment, the above four indices could not be restored to the control's level.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“tobacco cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 48–65 · show in text ↑
e1

“The net photosynthetic rate (Pn), transpiration rate (Tr), stomatal conductance (Gs) and intercellular CO 2 concentration (Ci) were tested”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 93–231 · show in text ↑
t1

“waterlogging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–23 · show in text ↑

flooding · physiology: gas exchange · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

flooding · physiology: photosynthesis · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.