Abstract
This experiment analyzed potted sell-root vines that were taken from the nursery, where was planted in the spring at the same year.The plants were treated under three unsuitable man-made conditions: Drought condition,high saline level in the water,over-watering.The result showed rootstock varieties 520A,225Ru and 5BB demonstrated higher resistant to drought,flood,and high salt conditions.Rootstock varieties SO4, 3309, Salt Crcck and Bcta also responded well to the three conditions previously mentioned.Cultivars Kyoho and Black 01ympia did not respnd well to the unsuitable conditions.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 520A showed higher resistance to drought, flooding and high salt conditions.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Material
- 520Ae1
- Treatment
- drought,flood,and high salt conditionse1
- Outcome
- resistante1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The result showed rootstock varieties 520A,225Ru and 5BB demonstrated higher resistant to drought,flood,and high salt conditions”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 225Ru showed higher resistance to drought, flooding and high salt conditions.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Material
- 225Rue1
- Treatment
- drought,flood,and high salt conditionse1
- Outcome
- resistante1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The result showed rootstock varieties 520A,225Ru and 5BB demonstrated higher resistant to drought,flood,and high salt conditions”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 5BB showed higher resistance to drought, flooding and high salt conditions.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Material
- 5BBe1
- Treatment
- drought,flood,and high salt conditionse1
- Outcome
- resistante1
- Direction
- highere1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“The result showed rootstock varieties 520A,225Ru and 5BB demonstrated higher resistant to drought,flood,and high salt conditions”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock SO4 responded well to the three unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e2“Rootstock varieties SO4, 3309, Salt Crcck and Bcta also responded well to the three conditions previously mentioned”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock 3309 responded well to the three unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e2“Rootstock varieties SO4, 3309, Salt Crcck and Bcta also responded well to the three conditions previously mentioned”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock Salt Creek responded well to the three unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e2“Rootstock varieties SO4, 3309, Salt Crcck and Bcta also responded well to the three conditions previously mentioned”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Rootstock Bcta responded well to the three unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e2“Rootstock varieties SO4, 3309, Salt Crcck and Bcta also responded well to the three conditions previously mentioned”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Kyoho did not respond well to the unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e3“Cultivars Kyoho and Black 01ympia did not respnd well to the unsuitable conditions”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
Claim · model-written summary
Cultivar Black 01ympia did not respond well to the unsuitable conditions.
Verbatim
e3“Cultivars Kyoho and Black 01ympia did not respnd well to the unsuitable conditions”
t0“Grape Rootstock Resistance”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · disease · VitisPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →drought · disease · VitisPositive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.