Paper · 2008 · Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Photosynthetic Bacteria on Growth Properties and Yield of Plastic House Crop

Sun Ying-hui

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The field experiment was conducted to study the effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production and calculate the incremental benefit.The results showed that the tested crop grew obviously better than the control after irrigating and spraying treatment.The yield of tested melon,ornamental pepper and tomato increased 862.5 kg/hm2,10 965 kg/hm2 and 9 712.5 kg/hm2 than that of the control crops,respectively.Moreover,the tested crop could be improved the quality of the fruits.Additionally,in melon production,the tested group could replace pesticide partly and provide the products two days before the control.In conclusion,usage of photosynthetic bacteria could increase yield,improve quality,reduce pesticide and enhance the economic efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic bacteria increased melon yield by 862.5 kg/hm2 over control crops.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe2
Treatment
photosynthetic bacteriae0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
862.5 kg/hm2e2
Comparator
control cropse2
Setting
Plastic Houset0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Plastic House Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield of tested melon,ornamental pepper and tomato increased 862.5 kg/hm2,10 965 kg/hm2 and 9 712.5 kg/hm2 than that of the control crops,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic bacteria increased ornamental pepper yield by 10 965 kg/hm2 over control crops.

Taxon
ornamental peppere2
Treatment
photosynthetic bacteriae0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
10 965 kg/hm2e2
Comparator
control cropse2
Setting
Plastic Houset0

Verbatim

t0

“Plastic House Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield of tested melon,ornamental pepper and tomato increased 862.5 kg/hm2,10 965 kg/hm2 and 9 712.5 kg/hm2 than that of the control crops,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic bacteria increased tomato yield by 9 712.5 kg/hm2 over control crops.

Treatment
photosynthetic bacteriae0
Outcome
yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
9 712.5 kg/hm2e2
Comparator
control cropse2
Setting
Plastic Houset0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Plastic House Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–87 · show in text ↑
e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e2

“The yield of tested melon,ornamental pepper and tomato increased 862.5 kg/hm2,10 965 kg/hm2 and 9 712.5 kg/hm2 than that of the control crops,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 316–470 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic bacteria could improve fruit quality of melon, ornamental pepper and tomato.

Taxon
melon,ornamental pepper and tomatoe0
Treatment
photosynthetic bacteriae0
Outcome
quality of the fruitse3
Direction
improvede3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e3

“Moreover,the tested crop could be improved the quality of the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–539 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In melon production, photosynthetic bacteria partly replaced pesticide use compared with the control.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe4
Treatment
photosynthetic bacteriae0
Outcome
pesticidee4
Direction
replacee4
Qualifier
partlye4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e4

“in melon production,the tested group could replace pesticide partly and provide the products two days before the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–673 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In melon production, the tested group supplied products two days before the control.

Taxon
melonCucumis meloe4
Outcome
provide the productse4
Value
two dayse4
Comparator
controle4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“in melon production,the tested group could replace pesticide partly and provide the products two days before the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 553–673 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthetic bacteria usage is concluded to enhance the economic efficiency of plastic house crop production.

Taxon
melon,ornamental pepper and tomatoe0
Outcome
economic efficiencye5

Verbatim

e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e5

“usage of photosynthetic bacteria could increase yield,improve quality,reduce pesticide and enhance the economic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 688–810 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tested crop grew better than the control after irrigating and spraying with photosynthetic bacteria.

Taxon
melon,ornamental pepper and tomatoe0
Treatment
irrigating and spraying treatmente1
Outcome
grewe1
Direction
bettere1
Comparator
controle1

Verbatim

e0

“effects of photosynthetic bacteria on plastic house crop such as melon,ornamental pepper and tomato production”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 48–158 · show in text ↑
e1

“The results showed that the tested crop grew obviously better than the control after irrigating and spraying treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–315 · show in text ↑

inoculation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.