Paper · 2019 · Agronomy

Evaluation of Organic Substrates and Microorganisms as Bio-Fertilisation Tool in Container Crop Production

Jose Luis Ruiz; Maria del Carmen Salas

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
21
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Microorganisms are only effective when adequate conditions for their survival and development are provided. Among the factors that influence its effectiveness includes the type of soil or culture substrate, which works as an energy source reserve. Therefore, a tomato and a melon crop were established in different cycles to assess the effect of the physicochemical properties of organic substrates based on coconut fibre and vermicompost in three proportions, 0:100, 40:60 and 60:40 (% v:v), on the microbial activity in the rhizosphere when the bacteria Azotobacter vinelandii, Bacillus megaterium and Frateuria aurantia were applied. Concentrations of NO3−, H2PO4−, K+ and Ca2+ in the petiole cellular extract (PCE) were quantified at 60, 90 and 120 days after transplantation (DAT) for tomato and 45 and 65 DAT for melon. We analysed dehydrogenase activity (DHA), acid phosphatase activity (FTA) and β-glucosidase activity (β-GLU). In order to maintain optimal volumetric moisture for the survival of microorganisms, automatic control was used to manage the irrigation frequency between 22%–28%. The results showed that physicochemical substrate properties, by incorporating 40% vermicompost into the coconut fibre mixture, increased enzymatic activity. Plants that were inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantia showed an improvement in NO3− and K+ assimilation achieving highest yields.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incorporating 40% vermicompost into the coconut fibre mixture increased rhizosphere enzymatic activity in tomato and melon crops.

Taxon
tomato and a melon crope2
Treatment
40% vermicompost into the coconut fibre mixturee1
Outcome
enzymatic activitye1
Direction
increasede1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“by incorporating 40% vermicompost into the coconut fibre mixture, increased enzymatic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1162–1256 · show in text ↑
e2

“a tomato and a melon crop were established in different cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–321 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato and melon plants inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantia showed improved NO3− and K+ assimilation.

Taxon
tomato and a melon crope2
Treatment
inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantiae3
Interactor
Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie3symbiont
Second interactor
Frateuria aurantiaFrateuria aurantiae3symbiont
Outcome
NO3− and K+ assimilatione3
Direction
an improvemente3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“a tomato and a melon crop were established in different cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–321 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants that were inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantia showed an improvement in NO3− and K+ assimilation achieving highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1411 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato and melon plants inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantia achieved the highest yields.

Taxon
tomato and a melon crope2
Treatment
inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantiae3
Interactor
Azotobacter vinelandiiAzotobacter vinelandiie3symbiont
Second interactor
Frateuria aurantiaFrateuria aurantiae3symbiont
Outcome
yieldse3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e2

“a tomato and a melon crop were established in different cycles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–321 · show in text ↑
e3

“Plants that were inoculated with Azotobacter vinelandii and Frateuria aurantia showed an improvement in NO3− and K+ assimilation achieving highest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1411 · show in text ↑

Azotobacter vinelandii · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Frateuria aurantia · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

inoculation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

201 papers: 172 positive, 29 negative or no effect

171 papers in the same direction as this paper · 27 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

197 papers more in this group

See all 201 papers →

inoculation · physiology: ion balance · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.