Paper · 2008 · Journal of Northwest A & F University

The content changes of several biochemistry substances of grafted armeniaca surviving

Zhang Xiao-pengb

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 This study was to find out the influence of biochemistry substances changes in surviving process after grafting.【Method】 Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials.Two-year-old Prunus sibirical coming from seeds were treated as rootstock(CK).Full bud with xylem of one-year trees of Prunus armeniaca(Long wangmao) were selected to graft on Prunus sibirical(grafted seedling).The change of several biochemistry substances contents in formation of callus after grafting in spring and summer were studied.【Result】 The trend of content change of cambium's water of grafted seedling was basically the same in two years Prunus sibirial(control seeding abbreviated as CK) and the grafted seedling,the latter was just little lower than control seedling.There were no or little difference in the content of water between grafted seedling and CK.The content of cambium of soluble protein of grafted seedling was higher than that of CK during the whole cicatrisation.The content of lignin of grafted seedling in cambium was higher than that of CK in prophase of cicatrisation and lower than that of CK in anaphase.The hydroxybenzene content of cambium of grafted seedling was higher than that of the CK during the whole course of cicatrisation.And the trend of change was similar.the surviving ratio of the grafted seedling in spring was 85.6% and in summer was 92.3%.【Conclusion】 High quantity of soluble protein,stimulative hydroxybenzene for cicatrisation and lignin in prophase would be good for the survival of grafted seedlings.In the precondition of good graft technic,the quantity of water in cambium was not the important factor of graft surviving.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambium water content of grafted seedlings showed no or little difference from control seedlings.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge1
Outcome
content of watere1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Comparator
CKe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e1

“There were no or little difference in the content of water between grafted seedling and CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 817–907 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambium soluble protein content of grafted seedlings was higher than in control seedlings throughout callus formation.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge2
Outcome
soluble proteine2
Direction
highere2
Comparator
CKe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e2

“The content of cambium of soluble protein of grafted seedling was higher than that of CK during the whole cicatrisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1027 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambium lignin content of grafted seedlings was higher than in control seedlings in prophase of callus formation.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge3
Outcome
content of lignine3
Direction
highere3
Qualifier
in prophase of cicatrisatione3
Comparator
CKe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of lignin of grafted seedling in cambium was higher than that of CK in prophase of cicatrisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambium lignin content of grafted seedlings was lower than in control seedlings in anaphase of callus formation.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge3
Outcome
lignine3
Direction
lowere4
Qualifier
in anaphasee4
Comparator
CKe4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e3

“The content of lignin of grafted seedling in cambium was higher than that of CK in prophase of cicatrisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1028–1136 · show in text ↑
e4

“and lower than that of CK in anaphase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1137–1174 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cambium hydroxybenzene content of grafted seedlings was higher than in control seedlings throughout callus formation.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge5
Outcome
hydroxybenzene contente5
Direction
highere5
Qualifier
during the whole course of cicatrisatione5
Comparator
CKe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e5

“The hydroxybenzene content of cambium of grafted seedling was higher than that of the CK during the whole course of cicatrisation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1304 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surviving ratio of grafted seedlings in spring was 85.6%.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge6
Outcome
surviving ratioe6
Value
85.6%e6
Setting
springe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e6

“the surviving ratio of the grafted seedling in spring was 85.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1404 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surviving ratio of grafted seedlings in summer was 92.3%.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Treatment
grafted seedlinge6
Outcome
surviving ratioe6
Value
92.3%e7
Setting
summere7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e6

“the surviving ratio of the grafted seedling in spring was 85.6%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1341–1404 · show in text ↑
e7

“and in summer was 92.3%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1428 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High soluble protein, hydroxybenzene and prophase lignin would be good for the survival of grafted seedlings.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Compound
soluble proteine1
Outcome
the survival of grafted seedlingse1
Direction
good fore1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e1

“High quantity of soluble protein,stimulative hydroxybenzene for cicatrisation and lignin in prophase would be good for the survival of grafted seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1442–1594 · show in text ↑
Associationauthor interpretationoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The quantity of water in cambium is not the important factor for graft survival.

Taxon
Prunus armeniacaPrunus armeniacae0
Compound
quantity of water in cambiume2
Outcome
graft survivinge2
Direction
not the important factore2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus armeniaca
Prunus armeniaca · TaxonFir0002 · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Two Armeniaca varieties,i.e.Prunus sibirical and Prunus armeniaca,were employed as the plant materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–235 · show in text ↑
e2

“the quantity of water in cambium was not the important factor of graft surviving”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1637–1717 · show in text ↑

grafting · molecular: metabolites · Prunus armeniaca (apricot)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.