Paper · 2010 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Changes in nitrogen accumulation,distribution,translocation and nitrogen use efficiency in different wheat cultivars under different irrigation conditions

Zhenzhu Xu

12
claims
24
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Differences of nitrogen uptake and utilization in different wheat cultivars under different irrigation amount and at different stages were studied with 15N tracing technique.Three irrigation regimes were applied in the present experiment: no irrigation during the whole growth season(represented as W0);irrigated both before sowing and at jointing stages(W1);irrigated 3 times,before sowing,at jointing and anthesis stages(W2).The results were as follows: under the same irrigation condition,total nitrogen accumulation amount,nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soil of cv.T23 were higher than those of cv.S664.Nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soil in vegetative organs at anthesis,in grain and vegetative organs at maturity of cv.T23,were higher than those of cv.S664.The above results indicated that cv.T23 had higher nitrogen absorptive capacity than cv.S664.Nitrogen translocation amount from fertilizer in vegetative organs after anthesis at treatment W2 was lower than that at treatment W1,while nitrogen translocation amount from soil had no significant change.However,nitrogen translocation amount both from fertilizer and soil were remarkably increased at treatment W2 compared with those at treatment W1.There were no significant difference on grain yield,grain protein yield and nitrogen use efficiency in cv.T23 plants between treatments W1 and W2,but grain protein content,irrigation benefit and water use efficiency at treatment W1 were higher.Grain yield and grain protein yield of cv.S664 at treatment W2 were higher than those at treatment W1,while there were no differences of grain protein content,nitrogen use efficiency,irrigation benefit and water use efficiency between treatments W1 and W2.In conclusion,treatment W1 is better irrigation model for cv.T23 while treatment W2 is better for cv.S664 because of high yield and high water/nitrogen use efficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T23 accumulated more total nitrogen than S664 under the same irrigation.

Material
cv.T23e0
Outcome
total nitrogen accumulation amounte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv.S664e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under the same irrigation condition,total nitrogen accumulation amount,nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soil of cv.T23 were higher than those of cv.S664.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T23 accumulated more fertilizer and soil nitrogen than S664.

Material
cv.T23e0
Outcome
nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv.S664e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soil of cv.T23 were higher than those of cv.S664.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 527–633 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T23 had greater nitrogen accumulation in vegetative organs at anthesis and in grain and vegetative organs at maturity.

Material
cv.T23e0
Outcome
Nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soile0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
cv.S664e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen accumulation amount derived from fertilizer and soil in vegetative organs at anthesis,in grain and vegetative organs at maturity of cv.T23,were higher than those of cv.S664.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–815 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer nitrogen translocation after anthesis was lower under W2 than W1.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
Nitrogen translocation amount from fertilizer in vegetative organs after anthesise0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
W1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Nitrogen translocation amount from fertilizer in vegetative organs after anthesis at treatment W2 was lower than that at treatment W1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil nitrogen translocation showed no significant change.

Outcome
nitrogen translocation amount from soile0
Direction
no significant changee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while nitrogen translocation amount from soil had no significant change.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1114 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors also report increased fertilizer and soil nitrogen translocation under W2 versus W1.

Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
nitrogen translocation amount both from fertilizer and soile0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
W1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen translocation amount both from fertilizer and soil were remarkably increased at treatment W2 compared with those at treatment W1.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

T23 grain yield, grain protein yield and nitrogen use efficiency did not differ significantly between W1 and W2.

Material
cv.T23e0
Treatment
W1e0
Outcome
grain yield,grain protein yield and nitrogen use efficiencye0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
W2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There were no significant difference on grain yield,grain protein yield and nitrogen use efficiency in cv.T23 plants between treatments W1 and W2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1260–1405 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T23 grain protein content, irrigation benefit and water use efficiency were higher under W1.

Treatment
W1e0
Outcome
grain protein content,irrigation benefit and water use efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grain protein content,irrigation benefit and water use efficiency at treatment W1 were higher.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1410–1504 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

S664 grain and protein yield were higher under W2 than W1.

Material
cv.S664e0
Treatment
W2e0
Outcome
Grain yield and grain protein yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
W1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield and grain protein yield of cv.S664 at treatment W2 were higher than those at treatment W1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1504–1605 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S664 grain protein content, nitrogen use efficiency, irrigation benefit and water use efficiency did not differ between W1 and W2.

Treatment
W1e0
Outcome
grain protein content,nitrogen use efficiency,irrigation benefit and water use efficiencye0
Direction
no differencese0
Comparator
W2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were no differences of grain protein content,nitrogen use efficiency,irrigation benefit and water use efficiency between treatments W1 and W2.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1612–1760 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

W1 was the preferred irrigation model for T23.

Material
cv.T23e0
Outcome
treatment W1 is better irrigation modele0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment W1 is better irrigation model for cv.T23”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1774–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

W2 was the preferred irrigation model for S664.

Material
cv.S664e0
Outcome
treatment W2 is bettere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatment W2 is better for cv.S664 because of high yield and high water/nitrogen use efficiency.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1831–1927 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑