Paper · 2011 · Bulletin of Soil and Water Conservation

Effect of Organic Fertilizer and Planting Density on Root Growth and Function of Maize in Dryland

Xue Jiquan

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This experiment was focused on the effect of organic fertilizer and planting density(60,75 and 90 thousand plants/hm2) on root growth and function of maize in field condition.The result showed that basal organic fertilizer reduced root length and surface area in 30—100 cm soil layer at pre-tasselling stage,but had no significant influence on root dry weight.The rate of root/shoot was significantly decreased because organic fertilizer dramatically increased the biomass of shoot.The influence of planting density on root growth was not significant.At waxen maturity stage,basal organic fertilizer restricted the distribution of root in 30—100 cm soil layer and at the position of 1/4 row space,1/2 row space,under plastic mulch,but had no significant influence on root/shoot.The trends of root length,root surface area and root dry weight were decreased as planting density increasing,especially in 0—30 cm soil layer and at planting position.The increase of planting density also decreased the rate of root/shoot,but increased the root function.Organic fertilizer also didn't show the significant effect on deferring senescence and had no significant difference in hydraulic conductivity of root system compared with the treatments without basal organic fertilizer.Root showed some flexibility by increasing water uptake function per surface area as planting density increasing.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal organic fertilizer reduced root length and surface area at 30–100 cm before tasselling.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
basal organic fertilizere0
Outcome
root length and surface areae0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
30—100 cm soil layer at pre-tasselling stagee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal organic fertilizer reduced root length and surface area in 30—100 cm soil layer at pre-tasselling stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–307 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal organic fertilizer had no significant effect on root dry weight.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
basal organic fertilizere0
Outcome
root dry weighte0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“basal organic fertilizer reduced root length and surface area in 30—100 cm soil layer at pre-tasselling stage,but had no significant influence on root dry weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 198–360 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer significantly decreased the root-to-shoot ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
rate of root/shoote0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of root/shoot was significantly decreased because organic fertilizer dramatically increased the biomass of shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 360–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer dramatically increased shoot biomass.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
biomass of shoote0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“organic fertilizer dramatically increased the biomass of shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–482 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Planting density did not significantly influence root growth in the stated comparison.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
root growthe0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The influence of planting density on root growth was not significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At waxen maturity, organic fertilizer restricted deep and lateral root distribution.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
basal organic fertilizere0
Outcome
distribution of roote0
Direction
restrictede0
Qualifier
30—100 cm soil layer and at the position of 1/4 row space,1/2 row space,under plastic mulche0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At waxen maturity stage,basal organic fertilizer restricted the distribution of root in 30—100 cm soil layer and at the position of 1/4 row space,1/2 row space,under plastic mulch”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At waxen maturity, organic fertilizer had no significant effect on the root-to-shoot ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
basal organic fertilizere0
Outcome
root/shoote0
Direction
no significant influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At waxen maturity stage,basal organic fertilizer restricted the distribution of root in 30—100 cm soil layer and at the position of 1/4 row space,1/2 row space,under plastic mulch,but had no significant influence on root/shoot.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 551–778 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length, surface area and dry weight decreased as planting density increased.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
root length,root surface area and root dry weighte0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The trends of root length,root surface area and root dry weight were decreased as planting density increasing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–887 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density decreased the root-to-shoot ratio.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
rate of root/shoote0
Direction
decreasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of planting density also decreased the rate of root/shoot”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1016 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing planting density increased root function.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
root functione0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The increase of planting density also decreased the rate of root/shoot,but increased the root function.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 946–1049 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer did not significantly defer senescence.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Organic fertilizere0
Outcome
deferring senescencee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Organic fertilizer also didn't show the significant effect on deferring senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1049–1131 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic fertilizer did not significantly alter root hydraulic conductivity.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
basal organic fertilizere0
Outcome
hydraulic conductivity of root systeme0
Direction
no significant differencee0
Comparator
treatments without basal organic fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“had no significant difference in hydraulic conductivity of root system compared with the treatments without basal organic fertilizer.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1269 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water uptake per root surface area increased with planting density.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
planting densitye0
Outcome
water uptake function per surface areae0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root showed some flexibility by increasing water uptake function per surface area as planting density increasing.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1269–1382 · show in text ↑
t0

“Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–86 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: postharvest · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

24 papers: 16 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

density · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

197 papers: 119 positive, 78 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this paper · 119 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

193 papers more in this group

See all 197 papers →

fertilization · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,365 papers: 1,196 positive, 169 negative or no effect

1,195 papers in the same direction as this paper · 149 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,361 papers more in this group

See all 1,365 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.