Paper · 2002 · Chinese Bulletin of Botany

Effects of Several Chemicals on Dormancy- releasing of 'NJ72' Nectarine

Yuan Zhi

13
claims
31
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Poor, delayed and ununiform bud break is a major problem for peaches in greenhouse. To clarify the mechanism of breaking bud dormancy in nectarine, the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated. Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea(w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect. But thiourea had a phytotoxic effect. The effect of ammonium nitrate was very similar to that of potassium nitrate, and flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform. In flower buds those were treated with dormancy_breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment, whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little. The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy, among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased, while the rate of the Embden_Meyerh pathway decreased and the rate of tricarboxlic acid cycle changed little. The activity of glucose 6_phosphate dehydrogenase, the key enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway(PPP), increased by dormancy_breaking agents, concomitantly with the activation of the pentose phosphate pathway.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea at 2% applied in November advanced flower bud break of nectarine by 20 days.

Treatment
2% thiourea(w/v) in Novembere2
Outcome
flower bud breake2
Direction
advancede2
Value
20 dayse2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea(w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate had no effect on nectarine flower bud break.

Treatment
potassium nitratee2
Outcome
flower bud breake2
Direction
no effecte2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e2

“Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea(w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 324–496 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea had a phytotoxic effect on nectarine.

Treatment
thioureae3
Outcome
phytotoxic effecte3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“But thiourea had a phytotoxic effect”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–534 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate had an effect very similar to that of potassium nitrate on nectarine bud break.

Treatment
ammonium nitratee4
Outcome
effecte4
Direction
very similare4
Comparator
potassium nitratee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of ammonium nitrate was very similar to that of potassium nitrate, and flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering of nectarine was ununiform with the two nitrates.

Treatment
the 2 nitratese4
Outcome
floweringe4
Direction
ununiforme4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e4

“The effect of ammonium nitrate was very similar to that of potassium nitrate, and flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents inhibited catalase activity in nectarine flower buds soon after treatment.

Treatment
dormancy_breaking agentse5
Outcome
catalase activitye5
Direction
inhibitede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy_breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents increased peroxidase activity in nectarine flower buds.

Treatment
dormancy_breaking agentse5
Outcome
peroxidase activitye6
Direction
increasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy_breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–780 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents changed superoxide dismutase little in nectarine flower buds.

Treatment
dormancy_breaking agentse5
Outcome
changes of superoxide dismutasee6
Direction
remained littlee6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy_breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–780 · show in text ↑
e6

“whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 782–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals increased the rate of respiration in nectarine flower buds during dormancy.

Treatment
chemicalse7
Outcome
rate of respiratione7
Direction
increasede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–951 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals increased the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway in nectarine flower buds.

Treatment
chemicalse7
Outcome
rate of the pentose phosphate pathwaye2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–951 · show in text ↑
e2

“among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1029 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals decreased the rate of the Embden-Meyerhof pathway in nectarine flower buds.

Treatment
chemicalse7
Outcome
rate of the Embden_Meyerh pathwaye4
Direction
decreasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–951 · show in text ↑
e4

“while the rate of the Embden_Meyerh pathway decreased and the rate of tricarboxlic acid cycle changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals changed the rate of the tricarboxylic acid cycle little in nectarine flower buds.

Treatment
chemicalse7
Outcome
rate of tricarboxlic acid cyclee4
Direction
changed littlee4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e7

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–951 · show in text ↑
e4

“while the rate of the Embden_Meyerh pathway decreased and the rate of tricarboxlic acid cycle changed little”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1031–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents increased glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity, concomitant with activation of the pentose phosphate pathway.

Treatment
dormancy_breaking agentse3
Gene
glucose 6_phosphate dehydrogenasee3
Outcome
activity of glucose 6_phosphate dehydrogenasee3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
concomitantly with the activation of the pentose phosphate pathwaye3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the effect of three dormancy_breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two_year old 'NJ72' nectarine ( Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 148–322 · show in text ↑
e3

“The activity of glucose 6_phosphate dehydrogenase, the key enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway(PPP), increased by dormancy_breaking agents, concomitantly with the activation of the pentose phosphate pathway”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1351 · show in text ↑

thiourea · crop injury · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.