Paper · 2002 · 植物学通报

几种化学药剂对‘NJ72’油桃休眠解除的影响

Zhi-You YUAN; Xian-Li LI; Tian-Li YAN

13
claims
35
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Poor, delayed and ununiform bud break is a major problem for peaches in greenhouse. To clarify the mechanism of breaking bud dormancy in nectarine, the effect of three dormancy-breaking agents, which were applied to the surface of dormant buds in two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine (Prunus persica L. Batsch), was investigated. Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea (w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect. But thiourea had a phytotoxic effect. The effect of ammonium nitrate was very similar to that of potassium nitrate, and flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform. In flower buds those were treated with dormancy-breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment, whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little. The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy, among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased, while the rate of the Embden-Meyerh pathway decreased and the rate of tricarboxlic acid cycle changed little. The activity of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the key enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), increased by dormancy-breaking agents, concomitantly with the activation of the pentose phosphate pathway.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea advanced nectarine flower bud break by 20 days.

Treatment
2% thiourea (w/v)e0
Outcome
flower bud breake0
Direction
advancede0
Value
20 dayse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea (w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Potassium nitrate did not affect nectarine flower bud break.

Treatment
potassium nitratee0
Outcome
flower bud breake0
Direction
no effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment of intact nectarine plant with 2% thiourea (w/v) in November advanced flower bud break in the following spring by 20 days, while potassium nitrate was of no effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–497 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Thiourea caused phytotoxicity in nectarine.

Treatment
thioureae0
Outcome
phytotoxic effecte0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“But thiourea had a phytotoxic effect.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–535 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ammonium nitrate had an effect similar to potassium nitrate on nectarine bud break.

Treatment
ammonium nitratee0
Outcome
effecte0
Direction
very similare0
Comparator
potassium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of ammonium nitrate was very similar to that of potassium nitrate, and flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 536–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flowering after nitrate treatment was nonuniform.

Treatment
2 nitratese0
Outcome
floweringe0
Direction
ununiforme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flowering with the 2 nitrates was ununiform.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 618–662 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents inhibited flower-bud catalase activity soon after treatment.

Organ / stage
flower budse0
Treatment
dormancy-breaking agentse0
Outcome
catalase activitye0
Direction
inhibitede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy-breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment, whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents increased flower-bud peroxidase activity.

Organ / stage
flower budse0
Treatment
dormancy-breaking agentse0
Outcome
peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy-breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment, whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower-bud superoxide dismutase changed little after dormancy-breaking treatment.

Organ / stage
flower budse0
Treatment
dormancy-breaking agentse0
Outcome
superoxide dismutasee0
Direction
remained littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In flower buds those were treated with dormancy-breaking agents, catalase activity was inhibited soon after treatment, whereas peroxidase activity increased, and changes of superoxide dismutase remained little.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 663–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals increased respiration in dormant nectarine flower buds.

Organ / stage
flower budse0
Treatment
chemicalse0
Outcome
rate of respiratione0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals increased the pentose phosphate pathway rate.

Treatment
chemicalse0
Outcome
rate of the pentose phosphate pathwaye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy, among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1029 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chemicals decreased the Embden-Meyerh pathway rate.

Treatment
chemicalse0
Outcome
rate of the Embden-Meyerh pathwaye0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy, among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased, while the rate of the Embden-Meyerh pathway decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1084 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tricarboxlic acid cycle rate changed little after chemical treatment.

Treatment
chemicalse0
Outcome
rate of tricarboxlic acid cyclee0
Direction
changed littlee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rate of respiration in flower buds increased by chemicals during dormancy, among of which, the rate of the pentose phosphate pathway was also increased, while the rate of the Embden-Meyerh pathway decreased and the rate of tricarboxlic acid cycle changed little.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–1140 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dormancy-breaking agents increased glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity.

Treatment
dormancy-breaking agentse0
Gene
glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenasee0
Outcome
activity of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenasee0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Prunus persica var. nucipersica
Prunus persica var. nucipersica · Taxon · picture of the speciesAllagash Brewing · CC BY 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The activity of glucose 6-phosphate dehydrogenase, the key enzyme in the pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), increased by dormancy-breaking agents, concomitantly with the activation of the pentose phosphate pathway.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1353 · show in text ↑
t0

“油桃”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 13–15 · show in text ↑
e1

“two-year old ‘NJ72’ nectarine”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–276 · show in text ↑

thiourea · crop injury · Prunus persica (peach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.