Abstract
The seeds of 7 triticale cultivars were treated with different concentrations PEG-6000,then examined the germination percentage,germination index,vigor index,length of seedling,coleoptile and root.The results showed that lower PEG concentration had a stimulating effect on the germination.As PEG concentration rose,the inhibitive effects on the seed germinations obviously increased.The different triticale cultivars were inhibited with different degree.The drought tolerance of ZHONGXIN830 was the strongest,the drought resistance ability of ZHONGSI828,ZHONGSI237 were stronger,JISI1,JISI2,NTH1048 and NTH1888 were medium.JINSONG49 was drought-sensitive cultivar in all cultivars.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Lower PEG concentration stimulated triticale germination.
- Taxon
- Triticale
×Triticosecalet0 - Treatment
- lower PEG concentratione0
- Outcome
- germinatione0
- Direction
- stimulatinge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“lower PEG concentration had a stimulating effect on the germination”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing PEG concentration increased inhibition of triticale seed germination.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Treatment
- PEG concentratione0
- Outcome
- inhibitive effects on the seed germinationse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“As PEG concentration rose,the inhibitive effects on the seed germinations obviously increased”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
The triticale cultivars differed in degree of PEG-induced inhibition.
- Taxon
- triticale×Triticosecalee0
- Material
- triticale cultivarse0
- Outcome
- inhibited with different degreee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The different triticale cultivars were inhibited with different degree”
Claim · model-written summary
ZHONGXIN830 had the strongest drought tolerance among the triticale cultivars.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- ZHONGXIN830e0
- Outcome
- drought tolerancee0
- Direction
- strongeste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The drought tolerance of ZHONGXIN830 was the strongest”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
ZHONGSI828 and ZHONGSI237 had stronger drought resistance.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- ZHONGSI828,ZHONGSI237e0
- Outcome
- drought resistance abilitye0
- Direction
- strongere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the drought resistance ability of ZHONGSI828,ZHONGSI237 were stronger”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
JISI1, JISI2, NTH1048 and NTH1888 had medium drought resistance.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- JISI1,JISI2,NTH1048 and NTH1888e0
- Outcome
- mediume0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“JISI1,JISI2,NTH1048 and NTH1888 were medium”
t0“Triticale”
Claim · model-written summary
JINSONG49 was drought-sensitive among the triticale cultivars.
- Taxon
- Triticale×Triticosecalet0
- Material
- JINSONG49e0
- Outcome
- drought-sensitive cultivare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“JINSONG49 was drought-sensitive cultivar in all cultivars”
t0“Triticale”
The same questions in other papers
drought · growth · x Triticosecale (triticale)Positive and negative results
10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
7 papers more in this group
See all 11 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.