Paper · 2011 · Acta Ecologica Sinica

Reproductive allocation in dioecious shrub,Rhamnus davurica

Ding Shengjian

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Life-history theory in plants has an important role in the development of many fields in evolutionary biology.The theory deals specifically with assumptions relating to the trade-off between reproductive and vegetative processes.Research on trade-offs has largely focused on dioecious species and the differences between sexes regarding patterns of resource allocation.In this research,the reproductive allocation was studied and specific assumptions were tested regarding the trade-off between reproductive and vegetative processes in the dioecious species Rhamnus davurica.Assuming automomy of different modular levels of plant physiology,we observed the reproductive allocation at branch level,shrub level and population level,respectively.The main results are:(1) at branch level,reproductive biomass shows significant difference between males and females(P0.001).The flower biomass is also significantly different between the sexes(P0.001).However,there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05).The flower,foliage and reproduction biomass(the sum of flower and fruit biomass) also showed significant differences among individuals(P0.001).The mean biomass value of the female flowers is 1.84 times greater than that of the male flowers.The mean biomass value of female reproduction(the sum of flower and fruit biomass) is 16 times greater than that of the male reproduction(male flower biomass).The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant.(2) at shrub level,the flower biomass,reproductive biomass(including flower and fruit biomass) and the diameter increment was significantly different between sexes(P0.05),but there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass(P0.05).An analysis of variance shows that DBH size is positively correlated with flower biomass,reproductive biomass,foliage biomass and diameter increment(P0.05).The average value of flower biomass of females is 1.6 times greater than that of the males.The average reproductive biomass of females(the sum of flower biomass and fruit biomass) is 1.93 times greater than that of the males and their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males.The average female diameter increment is 3.04 greater than that of the males.(3) at population level,male and female trees show differences in phenology.Male trees bloom earlier than female trees.The first male blooming was observed on 25 May,the first female blooming on 28 May.Female trees began to fruit on 8 June.In our 360m×660m research plot,there were 310 female and 53 male trees and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010.The population sex ratio of 0.17 deviated significantly from 1 ∶ 1,based on a Chi-square test(P0.001).The individuals in 0—2 cm,2—4 cm,4—6 cm and 6—8 cm DBH classes also exhibited female-biased sex ratios.The average annual ring widths of males and females were 0.78 mm and 0.83mm,respectively.Based on these results,we conclude that the relationship between vegetative growth and reproductive growth does not agree with trade-off theory at different levels of plant physiology(branch,shrub and population level) in Rhamnus davurica.It may be assumed that higher reproductive and vegetative growth of females might be due to their more effective photosynthetic rates.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch reproductive biomass differed significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Organ / stage
branch levele0
Outcome
reproductive biomasse0
Comparator
males and femalese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at branch level,reproductive biomass shows significant difference between males and females(P0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 768–867 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch flower biomass differed significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
flower biomasse0
Comparator
the sexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flower biomass is also significantly different between the sexes(P0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–944 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Branch foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Comparator
the sexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there is no significant difference in foliage biomass between the sexes(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1031 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower, foliage and reproduction biomass differed significantly among individuals.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
flower,foliage and reproduction biomasse0
Comparator
individualse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The flower,foliage and reproduction biomass(the sum of flower and fruit biomass) also showed significant differences among individuals(P0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1174 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean female flower biomass was 1.84 times male flower biomass.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
biomass value of the female flowerse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.84 timese0
Comparator
male flowerse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean biomass value of the female flowers is 1.84 times greater than that of the male flowers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1271 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean female reproduction biomass was 16 times male reproduction biomass.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
biomass value of female reproductione0
Direction
greatere0
Value
16 timese0
Comparator
male reproductione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean biomass value of female reproduction(the sum of flower and fruit biomass) is 16 times greater than that of the male reproduction(male flower biomass)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1272–1430 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Male foliage biomass exceeded female foliage biomass without a significant difference.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
biomass value of the male foliagee0
Direction
greatere0
Comparator
femalese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mean biomass value of the male foliage is greater than that of the females,though this difference is not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub flower and reproductive biomass and diameter increment differed significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Organ / stage
shrub levele0
Outcome
flower biomass,reproductive biomass(including flower and fruit biomass) and the diameter incremente0
Comparator
sexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at shrub level,the flower biomass,reproductive biomass(including flower and fruit biomass) and the diameter increment was significantly different between sexes(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1556–1722 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Shrub foliage biomass did not differ significantly by sex.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Comparator
sexese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was no significant difference between sexes regarding the foliage biomass(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1727–1813 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

DBH size correlated positively with flower and reproductive and foliage biomass and diameter increment.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
flower biomass,reproductive biomass,foliage biomass and diameter incremente0
Direction
positively correlatede0
Comparator
DBH sizee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DBH size is positively correlated with flower biomass,reproductive biomass,foliage biomass and diameter increment(P0.05)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1849–1969 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female shrub flower biomass was 1.6 times male biomass.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
flower biomass of femalese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.6 timese0
Comparator
malese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average value of flower biomass of females is 1.6 times greater than that of the males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1970–2060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female shrub reproductive biomass was 1.93 times male biomass.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
reproductive biomass of femalese0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.93 timese0
Comparator
malese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average reproductive biomass of females(the sum of flower biomass and fruit biomass) is 1.93 times greater than that of the males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2061–2194 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female shrub foliage biomass was 1.1 times male biomass.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
foliage biomasse0
Direction
greatere0
Value
1.1 timese0
Comparator
malese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“their average foliage biomass is 1.1 times greater than that of the males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2199–2272 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Female diameter increment exceeded male diameter increment by 3.04.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
female diameter incremente0
Direction
greatere0
Value
3.04e0
Comparator
malese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average female diameter increment is 3.04 greater than that of the males”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2273–2349 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Males began flowering earlier than females, on 25 May versus 28 May.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
Male trees bloome0
Direction
earliere0
Value
25 Maye0
Qualifier
28 Maye0
Comparator
female treese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Male trees bloom earlier than female trees.The first male blooming was observed on 25 May,the first female blooming on 28 May”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2426–2551 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Females began fruiting on 8 June.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Organ / stage
Female treese0
Outcome
began to fruite0
Value
8 Junee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Female trees began to fruit on 8 June”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2552–2589 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The plot contained 310 female, 53 male and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
female and 53 male trees and 225 non-reproductive treese0
Value
310 female and 53 male trees and 225 non-reproductive treese0
Qualifier
2010e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were 310 female and 53 male trees and 225 non-reproductive trees in 2010”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2621–2699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The population sex ratio of 0.17 significantly deviated from 1:1.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
population sex ratioe0
Direction
deviatede0
Value
0.17e0
Comparator
1 ∶ 1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The population sex ratio of 0.17 deviated significantly from 1 ∶ 1,based on a Chi-square test(P0.001)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2700–2801 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 0–2, 2–4, 4–6 and 6–8 cm DBH classes had female-biased sex ratios.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
female-biased sex ratiose0
Qualifier
0—2 cm,2—4 cm,4—6 cm and 6—8 cm DBH classese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The individuals in 0—2 cm,2—4 cm,4—6 cm and 6—8 cm DBH classes also exhibited female-biased sex ratios”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2802–2904 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mean annual ring widths were 0.78 mm for males and 0.83mm for females; authors concluded growth allocation did not follow trade-off theory.

Taxon
Rhamnus davuricaRhamnus davuricat0
Outcome
average annual ring widthse0
Value
0.78 mme0
Qualifier
0.83mme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Rhamnus davurica
Rhamnus davurica · TaxonSalicyna · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The average annual ring widths of males and females were 0.78 mm and 0.83mm,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2905–2993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rhamnus davurica”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–59 · show in text ↑