Paper · 2005 · Journal of Henan Vocation-technical Teachers College

Effects of Row Spacing on Yield of Different Types Wheat

Wu Yue

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Effects of row spacing on grain yield and its composing of different type wheat were studied.The results showed that there was remarkable difference on grain yield and yield composing in different types wheat. There was extremely remarkable difference on grain yield and ear number in different types wheat under the same planting density.The trend is that the highest grain yields and ear number of different types wheat under same planting density were obtained at row spacing 16.67 cm.The optimum row spacing required for realizing the biggest ear number of different types wheat was different because row spacing and variety of different types wheat did the effect each other on ear number.It suggests that grain yield may be increased by adjusting row spacing for raising ear number according to the effects of each yield components on yield of different types wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat types differed in grain yield and yield components.

Outcome
grain yield and yield composinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there was remarkable difference on grain yield and yield composing in different types wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 117–208 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a common planting density, wheat types differed markedly in grain yield and ear number.

Outcome
grain yield and ear numbere0
Qualifier
under the same planting densitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was extremely remarkable difference on grain yield and ear number in different types wheat under the same planting density”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–338 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a common planting density, grain yield was highest at 16.67 cm row spacing.

Treatment
row spacing 16.67 cme0
Outcome
grain yieldse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.67 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and ear number of different types wheat under same planting density were obtained at row spacing 16.67 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At a common planting density, ear number was highest at 16.67 cm row spacing.

Treatment
row spacing 16.67 cme0
Outcome
ear numbere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
16.67 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest grain yields and ear number of different types wheat under same planting density were obtained at row spacing 16.67 cm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimum row spacing for maximum ear number varied with wheat type.

Material
different types wheate0
Treatment
row spacinge0
Outcome
ear numbere0
Direction
differente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimum row spacing required for realizing the biggest ear number of different types wheat was different because row spacing and variety of different types wheat did the effect each other on ear number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–693 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest adjusting row spacing to raise ear number and grain yield.

Outcome
grain yield may be increased by adjusting row spacing for raising ear numbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“It suggests that grain yield may be increased by adjusting row spacing for raising ear number”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 694–787 · show in text ↑
t0

“Different Types Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–56 · show in text ↑

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.