Abstract
The effects of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation of summer maize with N,P,K,Zn and Mn fertilizer on high-fertility soil were studied.The results showed that relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil.N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them.Based on NPK fertilizers,micro-element fertilizers could significantly reduce P consumption,while the differences of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation were not significant between NPKZn(Mn)treatment and NPK treatment.P element and microelement content in soil were enough to satisfy the demand of high yield maize.The ear characters and plant characters of NK treatment were improved effectively.This treatment could obtain very high yield(9 821 kg/hm2).It was the best reasonable and the best economic.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 18
Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield for N was 91.2%.
Zea maysNot reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield for P was 100.3%.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield for K was 96.3%.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield for Zn was 99.4%.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil”
Claim · model-written summary
Relative yield for Mn was 99.9%.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“relative yield of N,P,K,Zn and Mn respectively was 91.2%,100.3%,96.3%,99.4% and 99.9% on the test soil”
Claim · model-written summary
N was distributed mainly to maize seed.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them”
Claim · model-written summary
P was distributed mainly to maize seed.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn was distributed mainly to maize seed.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them”
Claim · model-written summary
Mn was distributed mainly to leaves and seed.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them”
Claim · model-written summary
K was distributed mainly to every part.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“N,P and Zn which plant absorbed from soil mainly got into maize seed,Mn mainly got into leaves and seed,K was even in every part compare to them”
Claim · model-written summary
Microelement fertilizers reduced P consumption on an NPK base.
- Treatment
- micro-element fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- P consumptione0
- Direction
- reducee0
- Comparator
- NPK fertilizerse0
Not reportedTaxon
Verbatim
e0“Based on NPK fertilizers,micro-element fertilizers could significantly reduce P consumption,while the differences of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation were not significant between NPKZn(Mn)treatment and NPK treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
yield did not differ significantly between NPKZn(Mn) and NPK.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“Based on NPK fertilizers,micro-element fertilizers could significantly reduce P consumption,while the differences of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation were not significant between NPKZn(Mn)treatment and NPK treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
plant characters did not differ significantly between NPKZn(Mn) and NPK.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“Based on NPK fertilizers,micro-element fertilizers could significantly reduce P consumption,while the differences of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation were not significant between NPKZn(Mn)treatment and NPK treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
dry matter accumulation did not differ significantly between NPKZn(Mn) and NPK.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“Based on NPK fertilizers,micro-element fertilizers could significantly reduce P consumption,while the differences of yield,plant characters and dry matter accumulation were not significant between NPKZn(Mn)treatment and NPK treatment”
Claim · model-written summary
NK treatment improved ear characters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The ear characters and plant characters of NK treatment were improved effectively.This treatment could obtain very high yield(9 821 kg/hm2).It was the best reasonable and the best economic.”
Claim · model-written summary
NK treatment improved plant characters.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The ear characters and plant characters of NK treatment were improved effectively.This treatment could obtain very high yield(9 821 kg/hm2).It was the best reasonable and the best economic.”
Claim · model-written summary
NK treatment yielded 9 821 kg/hm2.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The ear characters and plant characters of NK treatment were improved effectively.This treatment could obtain very high yield(9 821 kg/hm2).It was the best reasonable and the best economic.”
Claim · model-written summary
NK treatment was judged most reasonable and economic.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“maize”
e0“The ear characters and plant characters of NK treatment were improved effectively.This treatment could obtain very high yield(9 821 kg/hm2).It was the best reasonable and the best economic.”
The same questions in other papers
manganese atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →fertilization · pest · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results
41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
60 papers more in this group
See all 64 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.