Abstract
Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials,the effects of a simplified canopy management system on growth and quality of vinifera were studied.The results showed that the simplified pruning method could shorter the internode,decrescented the ratio of diameter and pith.It was found that the fruit size of minimal pruning was smaller than CK.However,there was little difference between the two groups on the soluble solids of berry,the soluble solids and tissue structure of mature shoots,bud sprouting in the next year,and so on.Compared with the conventional ways,the minimal pruning method could improve the working efficiency and saving labour percentages were 39.72% on canopy management.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Simplified pruning shortened the internode of grape.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e1“the simplified pruning method could shorter the internode,decrescented the ratio of diameter and pith”
Claim · model-written summary
Simplified pruning decreased the ratio of shoot diameter to pith in grape.
- Taxon
- grapee0
- Treatment
- simplified pruning methode1
- Outcome
- ratio of diameter and pithe1
- Direction
- decrescentede1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e1“the simplified pruning method could shorter the internode,decrescented the ratio of diameter and pith”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit size under minimal pruning was smaller than under the control.
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e2“It was found that the fruit size of minimal pruning was smaller than CK”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimal pruning and conventional pruning showed little difference in berry soluble solids.
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e3“there was little difference between the two groups on the soluble solids of berry,the soluble solids and tissue structure of mature shoots,bud sprouting in the next year,and so on”
e4“Compared with the conventional ways,the minimal pruning method could improve the working efficiency and saving labour percentages were 39.72% on canopy management”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimal pruning and conventional pruning showed little difference in tissue structure of mature shoots.
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e3“there was little difference between the two groups on the soluble solids of berry,the soluble solids and tissue structure of mature shoots,bud sprouting in the next year,and so on”
e4“Compared with the conventional ways,the minimal pruning method could improve the working efficiency and saving labour percentages were 39.72% on canopy management”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimal pruning improved working efficiency compared with conventional ways.
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e4“Compared with the conventional ways,the minimal pruning method could improve the working efficiency and saving labour percentages were 39.72% on canopy management”
Claim · model-written summary
Minimal pruning saved 39.72% labour in canopy management compared with conventional ways.
Verbatim
e0“Taking 'Cabernt sauvignon' grape as test materials”
e4“Compared with the conventional ways,the minimal pruning method could improve the working efficiency and saving labour percentages were 39.72% on canopy management”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ
19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
57 papers more in this group
See all 61 papers →pruning · soil: physics · VitisPositive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.