Paper · 2004 · Journal of Henan Vocation-technical Teachers College

Early Report on the High Selenium Technique Study of the Strong Gluten Wheat

MA Yu-xia

4
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experimenting of the density fertilizer shows that spraying in empress stage of wheat growth is no obvious influence,on the main factor of forming yield and the yield.The selenium content of the wheat grain increases very remarkably.The absorption of the selenium of the strong gluten wheat is higher than the common wheat.The effect of spraying in grain filling stage is better than in boot stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at the empress stage had no obvious effect on yield components or yield.

Treatment
spraying in empress stagee0
Outcome
main factor of forming yield and the yielde0
Direction
no obvious influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying in empress stage of wheat growth is no obvious influence,on the main factor of forming yield and the yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat grain selenium content increased markedly after spraying.

Organ / stage
graine1
Treatment
sprayinge0
Outcome
selenium contente1
Direction
increases very remarkablye1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“spraying in empress stage of wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 51–92 · show in text ↑
e1

“The selenium content of the wheat grain increases very remarkably.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 167–233 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Strong gluten wheat absorbed more selenium than common wheat.

Material
strong gluten wheate0
Outcome
absorption of the seleniume0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
common wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The absorption of the selenium of the strong gluten wheat is higher than the common wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 233–323 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spraying at grain filling was better than spraying at boot stage.

Treatment
spraying in grain filling stagee0
Outcome
bettere0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
boot stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of spraying in grain filling stage is better than in boot stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–398 · show in text ↑
e1

“wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 80–92 · show in text ↑

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.