Paper · 2014 · Mailei zuowu xuebao

Control Effects of 12 Herbicides on Broadleaf Weeds in Winter Wheat Field

LU Xing-ta

11
claims
20
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to screen herbicides with high control efficiency on broadleaf weeds in winter wheat field,field trails were carried out with 12 currently commonly used herbicides.The results revealed that 40% Carfentrazone-ethyl WG was the best in controlling the three target weeds and the total weed plant reduction was 91.78% after 15 days with 30g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed.And 55% tribenuron-methyl·carfenteazone·MCPA-Na WP was the best after 30 days with 412.5g(a.i.)·hm-2 applied,the total weed plant reduction was 96.53% and fresh weight reduction was up to 98.79%.The total weed plant reduction of 58g·L-1 florasulam· flumetsulan SC with 11.8g(a.i.)·hm-2sprayed and the fresh weight reduction of 37% clodinafop-propargyl·bensulfuron-mythyl·carfentrazone WP with 222g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed was better,with control effect of 93.59% and 98.76%,respectively.The control efficiency of 30% clopyralid AS with 202.50g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed was the lowest in fresh weight reduction,which was only 35.29%.The results also showed that there were individual differences in chemosensitivity of 3 broadleaf weeds for the same d herbicides.Differences were also observed in the damage of the 12 herbicides to wheat.All the treatments were safe to thewheat except that carfentrazone-ethyl or its mixturecan caused contact phytotoxicity decay in wheat plant,and pyroxsulam resulted with yellow leaves.However,the damages were resumable and had no effect on the yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone reduced weed plants by 91.78% at 15 days.

Taxon
winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
40% Carfentrazone-ethyl WGe0
Interactor
weedse0weed
Outcome
total weed plant reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
91.78%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“40% Carfentrazone-ethyl WG was the best in controlling the three target weeds and the total weed plant reduction was 91.78% after 15 days with 30g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 199–364 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter Wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tribenuron mixture reduced weed plants by 96.53% at 30 days.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
55% tribenuron-methyl·carfenteazone·MCPA-Na WPe0
Outcome
total weed plant reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
96.53%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“55% tribenuron-methyl·carfenteazone·MCPA-Na WP was the best after 30 days with 412.5g(a.i.)·hm-2 applied,the total weed plant reduction was 96.53%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–515 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The tribenuron mixture reduced weed fresh weight by 98.79%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
55% tribenuron-methyl·carfenteazone·MCPA-Na WPe0
Outcome
fresh weight reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
98.79%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“55% tribenuron-methyl·carfenteazone·MCPA-Na WP was the best after 30 days with 412.5g(a.i.)·hm-2 applied,the total weed plant reduction was 96.53% and fresh weight reduction was up to 98.79%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 369–559 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Florasulam mixture reduced weed plants by 93.59%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
58g·L-1 florasulam· flumetsulan SCe0
Outcome
total weed plant reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
93.59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total weed plant reduction of 58g·L-1 florasulam· flumetsulan SC with 11.8g(a.i.)·hm-2sprayed and the fresh weight reduction of 37% clodinafop-propargyl·bensulfuron-mythyl·carfentrazone WP with 222g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed was better,with control effect of 93.59% and 98.76%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop mixture reduced weed fresh weight by 98.76%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
37% clodinafop-propargyl·bensulfuron-mythyl·carfentrazone WPe0
Outcome
fresh weight reductione0
Direction
reductione0
Value
98.76%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The total weed plant reduction of 58g·L-1 florasulam· flumetsulan SC with 11.8g(a.i.)·hm-2sprayed and the fresh weight reduction of 37% clodinafop-propargyl·bensulfuron-mythyl·carfentrazone WP with 222g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed was better,with control effect of 93.59% and 98.76%,respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 560–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clopyralid had the lowest fresh weight reduction, 35.29%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
30% clopyralid ASe0
Outcome
fresh weight reductione0
Direction
loweste0
Value
35.29%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The control efficiency of 30% clopyralid AS with 202.50g(a.i.)·hm-2 sprayed was the lowest in fresh weight reduction,which was only 35.29%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 847–986 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed species differed in herbicide sensitivity.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Interactor
broadleaf weedse0weed
Outcome
individual differences in chemosensitivity of 3 broadleaf weedse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“there were individual differences in chemosensitivity of 3 broadleaf weeds for the same d herbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1015–1115 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicides differed in damage to wheat.

Outcome
damage of the 12 herbicides to wheate0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Differences were also observed in the damage of the 12 herbicides to wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1116–1191 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carfentrazone or its mixture caused contact phytotoxicity in wheat.

Treatment
carfentrazone-ethyl or its mixturee0
Outcome
contact phytotoxicity decaye0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“carfentrazone-ethyl or its mixturecan caused contact phytotoxicity decay in wheat plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1331 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pyroxsulam yellowed wheat leaves.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
pyroxsulame0
Outcome
yellow leavese0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pyroxsulam resulted with yellow leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1336–1374 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide damage was reversible and did not affect yield.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
no effect on the yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the damages were resumable and had no effect on the yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1383–1440 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 55–67 · show in text ↑

carfentrazone-ethyl · crop injury · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 3 positive, 7 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

(4-chloro-2-methylphenoxy)acetic acid · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 10 positive, 1 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    MCPA gave poor weed control.

    Evaluating on Herbicide Efficacy against Galium aparina L. in Wheat Fields · 2007 · compared with different temperature conditions

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

carfentrazone-ethyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

26 papers: 26 positive, 0 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.