Paper · 2014 · Zhongguo nongye Kexue

Effects of Different Irrigation Treatments on the Growth and Fruit Quality of Himrod in Protected Cultivation

LI Ya-sha

18
claims
43
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

【Objective】 Under the background of severe shortage of water resource and continuous development of facility cultivation, there is of important practical significance for studying the efficient use of water resource under protected cultivation condition. Based on this reason, the objective of this article was to select an optimal irrigation method and supply a substantial theoretical support for actual production application. 【Method】 Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials. There were four different irrigation methods, including full irrigation, alternate partial root-zone irrigation, water deficit pre-or post-veraison irrigation methods, which were used for the grapevine. Then the effects of different irrigation methods on the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, particle size, length of cluster, weight of cluster, berry weight, fruit quality, photosynthetic parameter of leaf, water use efficiency, leaf water potential, and fruit yield were analyzed. Based on these analyses, the best irrigation method could be screened out through comprehensive assessment. 【Result】 The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry. The effects of different patterns of water deficit on scores internal quality of berry were different. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation and water deficit after veraison both enhanced the scores significantly, but water deficit during pre-veraison made the scores below the contrast treatment. Water deficit lowered the net photosynthetic, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of leaf, while increased the intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiency of it. In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter. The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment. 【Conclusion】 Water deficit could be as a strategy to regulate the vegetative and reproductive growth, improve fruit quality and water use efficiency, thus increasing the economic and ecological benefits. Water deficit could also reduce the net photosynthetic rate and leaf water potential, which had a bad effect on the berry growth. Water deficit during post-veraison could reduce the plant's vigour, maintain yield and improve fruit quality and water use efficiency, it is a better strategy compared with the other irrigation methods.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced the number of axillary shoots, leaf area and stem diameter of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diametere1
Direction
reducee1
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit reduced internode length and weight of summer pruning of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
internodes length, weight of summer pruninge1
Direction
reducee1
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased berry length, berry width and berry weight of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
berry length, berry width, berry weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit decreased cluster length and cluster weight of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
cluster length, and cluster weighte1
Direction
decreasee1
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased reducing sugar, soluble solids and Vc of berry in Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficite1
Outcome
reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berrye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e1

“The three different patterns of water deficit could not only reduce the number of axillary shoots, leaf area, stem diameter, internodes length, weight of summer pruning, but also decrease berry length, berry width, berry weight, cluster length, and cluster weight. However, they increased reducing sugar, soluble solids, Vc of berry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1538 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate partial root-zone irrigation significantly enhanced the internal quality scores of Himrod berries compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
Alternate partial root-zone irrigatione2
Outcome
the scorese2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
contrast treatmente2
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e2

“Alternate partial root-zone irrigation and water deficit after veraison both enhanced the scores significantly, but water deficit during pre-veraison made the scores below the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit after veraison significantly enhanced the internal quality scores of Himrod berries compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficit after veraisone2
Outcome
the scorese2
Direction
enhancede2
Comparator
contrast treatmente2
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e2

“Alternate partial root-zone irrigation and water deficit after veraison both enhanced the scores significantly, but water deficit during pre-veraison made the scores below the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit during pre-veraison made the internal quality scores of Himrod berries lower than the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficit during pre-veraisone2
Outcome
the scorese2
Direction
belowe2
Comparator
contrast treatmente2
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e2

“Alternate partial root-zone irrigation and water deficit after veraison both enhanced the scores significantly, but water deficit during pre-veraison made the scores below the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1837 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit lowered the net photosynthetic rate, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of Himrod leaves compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
Water deficite3
Outcome
net photosynthetic, stomatal conductance and transpiration ratee3
Direction
lowerede3
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e3

“Water deficit lowered the net photosynthetic, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of leaf, while increased the intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiency of it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–2020 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit increased intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiency of Himrod leaves compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
Water deficite3
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiencye3
Direction
increasede3
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e3

“Water deficit lowered the net photosynthetic, stomatal conductance and transpiration rate of leaf, while increased the intercellular CO2 concentration and water use efficiency of it”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1839–2020 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point and dark respiratory rate of Himrod were higher than in the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficit treatmentse4
Outcome
initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory ratee4
Direction
highere4
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In water deficit treatments, the maximum net photosynthetic rate of Himrod was lower than in the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficit treatmentse4
Outcome
maximum net photosynthetic ratee4
Direction
lowere4
Comparator
contrast treatmente4
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e4

“In water deficit treatments, initial quantum efficiency, light compensation point, dark respiratory rate were higher than contrast treatment, but the maximum net photosynthetic rate was lower than the latter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf water potential was higher in the contrast treatment than in the other treatments of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Outcome
leaf water potentialse5
Direction
highere5
Comparator
contrast treatmente5

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e5

“The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2306 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Alternate partial root-zone irrigation significantly reduced yield of Himrod table grape compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
Alternate partial root-zone irrigation methode5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
contrast treatmente5
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e5

“The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit during pre-veraison significantly reduced yield of Himrod table grape compared with the contrast treatment.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
water deficit during pre-veraisone5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
reducede5
Comparator
contrast treatmente5
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e5

“The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2584 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield decrease from water deficit applied post-veraison was not obvious compared with the contrast treatment of Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Material
Himrode0
Treatment
regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraisone5
Outcome
yield decreasee5
Direction
not obviouse5
Comparator
contrast treatmente5
Setting
protected cultivation conditione0

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e5

“The leaf water potentials of contrast treatment were higher than the others. Alternate partial root-zone irrigation method and water deficit during pre-veraison reduced yield significantly, however, the yield decrease caused by regulating deficit irrigation of water deficit occurred post-veraison was not obvious as compared with the contrast treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2231–2584 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit could be used as a strategy to regulate the vegetative and reproductive growth of table grape, improving fruit quality and water use efficiency.

Taxon
table grapee0
Outcome
strategy to regulate the vegetative and reproductive growthe6

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e6

“Water deficit could be as a strategy to regulate the vegetative and reproductive growth, improve fruit quality and water use efficiency, thus increasing the economic and ecological benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2599–2788 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit applied during post-veraison is recommended as a better strategy than the other irrigation methods for Himrod table grape.

Taxon
table grapee0
Outcome
Water deficit during post-veraisone7
Qualifier
better strategy compared with the other irrigation methodse7

Verbatim

e0

“Under the protected cultivation condition, the table grape variety Himrod was used as test materials”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–539 · show in text ↑
e7

“Water deficit during post-veraison could reduce the plant's vigour, maintain yield and improve fruit quality and water use efficiency, it is a better strategy compared with the other irrigation methods”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2920–3121 · show in text ↑

drought · yield · VitisResults differ

19 papers: 4 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

drought · quality: sugar starch · VitisResults differ

21 papers: 10 positive, 11 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · VitisResults differ

36 papers: 7 positive, 29 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

irrigation · yield · VitisResults differ

83 papers: 52 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

drought · physiology: gas exchange · VitisPositive and negative results

18 papers: 3 positive, 15 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.