Paper · 2014 · Xi'nan nongye xuebao

Physiological Characteristics of Osmotic Adjustment and Content of Chlorophyll of H8 and H10 Carrying DNA Segments of Alternanthera philoxeroides

Cha Guo

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper,the introgression lines H8 and H10 carrying DNA segments of Alternanthera philoxeroides,recipient of the introgression lines 6527( CK1) and IAPAR9( CK2) were used as tested materials,randomized block experiments were designed,and the physiological characteristics of osmotic adjustment and the content of chlorophyll were studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress. The results showed that( i) The proline content under drought stress in 12 days were significantly greater than that under no drought stress treatment( P 0. 05). Total chlorophyll content,chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content dropped significantly under drought stress.( ii) Content of proline in drought-tolerant H8 was 14. 16 μg /g higher than that in IAPAR9( CK2)( P 0. 05). The increasing amplitudes of total chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll were greater than that in IAPAR9( CK2)( P 0. 05).( iii) The proline content of H8 and IAPAR9 increased greater at the same time,with smaller decreased amplitude on the chlorophyll content. These results would be useful for breeding of rice varieties with drought-tolerant characters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content under drought stress was significantly greater than without drought after 12 days.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse2
Outcome
proline contente2
Direction
greatere2
Qualifier
in 12 dayse2
Comparator
no drought stress treatmente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e2

“The proline content under drought stress in 12 days were significantly greater than that under no drought stress treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 451–573 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Drought-tolerant H8 had 14.16 μg/g more proline than IAPAR9 under drought stress.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
H8e3
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
Content of prolinee3
Direction
highere3
Value
14. 16 μg /ge3
Comparator
IAPAR9e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e3

“Content of proline in drought-tolerant H8 was 14. 16 μg /g higher than that in IAPAR9( CK2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–791 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increase amplitudes of total chlorophyll a, chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll under drought were greater than in IAPAR9.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
increasing amplitudes of total chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and total chlorophylle4
Direction
greatere4
Comparator
IAPAR9e4

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e4

“The increasing amplitudes of total chlorophyll a,chlorophyll b and total chlorophyll were greater than that in IAPAR9( CK2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline content of H8 and IAPAR9 increased greater at the same time under drought stress.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
H8 and IAPAR9e5
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
proline contente5
Direction
increased greatere5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e5

“The proline content of H8 and IAPAR9 increased greater at the same time,with smaller decreased amplitude on the chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content declined by a smaller amplitude in H8 and IAPAR9 under drought stress.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Material
H8 and IAPAR9e5
Treatment
drought stresse0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente5
Direction
smaller decreased amplitudee5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e5

“The proline content of H8 and IAPAR9 increased greater at the same time,with smaller decreased amplitude on the chlorophyll content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 944–1075 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

These results would be useful for breeding rice varieties with drought tolerance (authors recommendation).

Taxon
rice varietiesOryza sativae6
Outcome
breeding of rice varieties with drought-tolerant characterse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“These results would be useful for breeding of rice varieties with drought-tolerant characters”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1077–1170 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Total chlorophyll, chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content dropped significantly under drought stress.

Taxon
upland riceOryza sativae0
Treatment
drought stresse7
Outcome
Total chlorophyll content,chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b contente7
Direction
droppede7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“studied with 3 upland rice varieties and one common rice control under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 336–421 · show in text ↑
e7

“Total chlorophyll content,chlorophyll a and chlorophyll b content dropped significantly under drought stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–693 · show in text ↑

drought · physiology: pigments · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

42 papers: 6 positive, 36 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

drought · physiology: osmolytes · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

45 papers: 34 positive, 11 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.