Paper · 2008 · Hebei Journal of Forestry and Orchard Research

Effects of plant growth regulators on rapid growth seedlings of pear stunted rootstock SPRB15

YU Lan-jing

3
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To study the rapid growth of pear stunted rootstock,seedlings of pear stunted rootstock SPRB15 were used to follow the effects of plant growth regulators on rapid growth of the seedlings.The results showed that the increases of seedlings' diameter and height which sprayed 100 mg/L GA(4+7) twice with 7 days interval(treatment 4) were the best in this trial;next were that of sprayed GA3 100 mg/L twice(treatment 2),sprayed GA(4+7)50 mg/L twice(treatment 3),sprayed GA3 50 mg/L twice(treatment 1),and sprayed BA 250 mg/L twice(treatment 5),in order.The results indicated that GA(4+7) and GA3 had the effects of promoting the growth of pear stunted rootstock SPRB15;BA had the effect of promoting the sprouting of lateral bud.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Two sprays of 100 mg/L GA(4+7) gave the best seedling diameter and height increases.

Material
SPRB15t0
Treatment
100 mg/L GA(4+7) twice with 7 days intervale0
Outcome
seedlings' diameter and heighte0
Direction
beste0
Comparator
in this triale0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the increases of seedlings' diameter and height which sprayed 100 mg/L GA(4+7) twice with 7 days interval(treatment 4) were the best in this trial”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 211–357 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear stunted rootstock SPRB15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 and GA(4+7) treatments promoted seedling growth.

Material
SPRB15e0
Treatment
GA(4+7) and GA3e0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GA(4+7) and GA3 had the effects of promoting the growth of pear stunted rootstock SPRB15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–664 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

BA promoted lateral bud sprouting in pear rootstock seedlings.

Material
SPRB15t0
Treatment
BAe0
Outcome
sprouting of lateral bude0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Pyrus communis
Pyrus communis · TaxonDidier Descouens · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“BA had the effect of promoting the sprouting of lateral bud.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 665–725 · show in text ↑
t0

“pear stunted rootstock SPRB15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–93 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · growth · Pyrus communis (pear)Results differ

12 papers: 9 positive, 3 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

N-benzyladenine · quality: postharvest · Pyrus communis (pear)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.