Paper · 2014

Grafting plantlet raising technique by nurse-seed-grafting of Camellia oleifera

Mi Zhang

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

During the process of nurse-seed-grafted grafting plantlet of Camellia oleifera,the root stock varieties,grafting time,number of leaf retention,picking parts and scion freshness were studied. The results showed that different treatments influenced on grafting survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness at a certain extent. The survival rate of grafting was the highest with 79. 9%,when the seedlings from medium fruit C. oleifera were used as root stock. Whereas,the difference of the survival rate of grafting was not obvious among different root stock varieties. The sprout length and sprout coarseness were the largest with 13. 4 cm and 3. 6 mm grafted 90 days later respectively,when big fruit C. oleifera seeds were used as root stock. The survival rate,sprout length and coarseness were the highest with 90. 0%,12. 7 cm and 3. 2 mm respectively when grafting time was in May 15,thus the later grafting time was,the lower the survival rate was. The leaf retention surface size didn't influence significantly on the survival rate and growth. Upper scions of the mother tree presented the extremely significant difference on grafting survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness comparing with middle and lower scions with 91. 1%,13. 3 cm and 3. 3 mm respectively. The survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness as picking scions and grafting on same day were significantly higher than that as scions saved for three days for grafting with92. 2%,14. 5 cm,3. 2 mm respectively,thus the shorter scions storage time was,the higher grafting survival rate was.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Medium fruit rootstock gave the highest graft survival, 79. 9%.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
seedlings from medium fruit C. oleiferae0
Outcome
survival rate of graftinge0
Direction
higheste0
Value
79. 9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate of grafting was the highest with 79. 9%,when the seedlings from medium fruit C. oleifera were used as root stock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 331–462 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Graft survival did not differ obviously among rootstock varieties.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Outcome
survival rate of graftinge0
Direction
not obviouse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the difference of the survival rate of grafting was not obvious among different root stock varieties.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 471–572 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Big fruit rootstock gave the largest sprout length, 13. 4 cm.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
big fruit C. oleifera seedse0
Outcome
sprout lengthe0
Direction
largeste0
Value
13. 4 cme0
Qualifier
grafted 90 days latere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sprout length and sprout coarseness were the largest with 13. 4 cm and 3. 6 mm grafted 90 days later respectively,when big fruit C. oleifera seeds were used as root stock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Big fruit rootstock gave the largest sprout coarseness, 3. 6 mm.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
big fruit C. oleifera seedse0
Outcome
sprout coarsenesse0
Direction
largeste0
Value
3. 6 mme0
Qualifier
grafted 90 days latere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The sprout length and sprout coarseness were the largest with 13. 4 cm and 3. 6 mm grafted 90 days later respectively,when big fruit C. oleifera seeds were used as root stock.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 573–748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May 15 grafting gave the highest survival rate, 90. 0%.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
grafting time was in May 15e0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90. 0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and coarseness were the highest with 90. 0%,12. 7 cm and 3. 2 mm respectively when grafting time was in May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May 15 grafting gave the highest sprout length, 12. 7 cm.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
grafting time was in May 15e0
Outcome
sprout lengthe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12. 7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and coarseness were the highest with 90. 0%,12. 7 cm and 3. 2 mm respectively when grafting time was in May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

May 15 grafting gave the highest coarseness, 3. 2 mm.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
grafting time was in May 15e0
Outcome
coarsenesse0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3. 2 mme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and coarseness were the highest with 90. 0%,12. 7 cm and 3. 2 mm respectively when grafting time was in May 15”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 749–891 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Later grafting reduced survival.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
later grafting timee0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the later grafting time was,the lower the survival rate was”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–956 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf retention surface size had no significant effect on survival or growth.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
leaf retention surface sizee0
Outcome
survival rate and growthe0
Direction
didn't influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The leaf retention surface size didn't influence significantly on the survival rate and growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 958–1053 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper scions significantly differed from middle and lower scions in grafting survival rate (91. 1%).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
Upper scionse0
Outcome
grafting survival ratee0
Value
91. 1%e0
Comparator
middle and lower scionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upper scions of the mother tree presented the extremely significant difference on grafting survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness comparing with middle and lower scions with 91. 1%,13. 3 cm and 3. 3 mm respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper scions significantly differed from middle and lower scions in sprout length (13. 3 cm).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
Upper scionse0
Outcome
sprout lengthe0
Value
13. 3 cme0
Comparator
middle and lower scionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upper scions of the mother tree presented the extremely significant difference on grafting survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness comparing with middle and lower scions with 91. 1%,13. 3 cm and 3. 3 mm respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Upper scions significantly differed from middle and lower scions in sprout coarseness (3. 3 mm).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
Upper scionse0
Outcome
sprout coarsenesse0
Value
3. 3 mme0
Comparator
middle and lower scionse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Upper scions of the mother tree presented the extremely significant difference on grafting survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness comparing with middle and lower scions with 91. 1%,13. 3 cm and 3. 3 mm respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1280 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Same-day grafting gave significantly higher survival rate than three-day storage (92. 2%).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
picking scions and grafting on same daye0
Outcome
survival ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
92. 2%e0
Comparator
scions saved for three dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness as picking scions and grafting on same day were significantly higher than that as scions saved for three days for grafting with92. 2%,14. 5 cm,3. 2 mm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Same-day grafting gave significantly higher sprout length than three-day storage (14. 5 cm).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
picking scions and grafting on same daye0
Outcome
sprout lengthe0
Direction
highere0
Value
14. 5 cme0
Comparator
scions saved for three dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness as picking scions and grafting on same day were significantly higher than that as scions saved for three days for grafting with92. 2%,14. 5 cm,3. 2 mm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Same-day grafting gave significantly higher sprout coarseness than three-day storage (3. 2 mm).

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
picking scions and grafting on same daye0
Outcome
sprout coarsenesse0
Direction
highere0
Value
3. 2 mme0
Comparator
scions saved for three dayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The survival rate,sprout length and sprout coarseness as picking scions and grafting on same day were significantly higher than that as scions saved for three days for grafting with92. 2%,14. 5 cm,3. 2 mm respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1281–1498 · show in text ↑
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–79 · show in text ↑

grafting · survival · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

in vitro · survival · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.