Abstract
Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion,comparative trial of the aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting was conducted in late January.The results showed that two kinds of grafting binding material had no significant difference in survival rate and seedling growth,and the total cost required basically flatted.But the application of aluminum was more convenient and quick,and saved time and effort,so it was recommended as a binding material in C.oleifera small seedlings grafting.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminum and plastic grafting bindings gave similar survival rate.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleiferae0 - Material
- Cenruan 3e0
- Treatment
- aluminum binding graftinge2
- Outcome
- survival ratee1
- Direction
- no significant differencee1
- Comparator
- plastic strap binding graftinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“two kinds of grafting binding material had no significant difference in survival rate and seedling growth,and the total cost required basically flatted.”
e2“aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminum and plastic grafting bindings gave similar seedling growth.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
- Material
- Cenruan 3e0
- Treatment
- aluminum binding graftinge2
- Outcome
- seedling growthe1
- Direction
- no significant differencee1
- Comparator
- plastic strap binding graftinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“two kinds of grafting binding material had no significant difference in survival rate and seedling growth,and the total cost required basically flatted.”
e2“aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminum and plastic grafting bindings gave similar total cost.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
- Material
- Cenruan 3e0
- Treatment
- aluminum binding graftinge2
- Outcome
- total coste1
- Direction
- basically flattede1
- Comparator
- plastic strap binding graftinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“two kinds of grafting binding material had no significant difference in survival rate and seedling growth,and the total cost required basically flatted.”
e2“aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminum binding was more convenient and quicker than plastic strap binding.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
- Treatment
- aluminum binding graftinge2
- Outcome
- more convenient and quicke1
- Direction
- more convenient and quicke1
- Comparator
- plastic strap binding graftinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“the application of aluminum was more convenient and quick,and saved time and effort,so it was recommended as a binding material in C.oleifera small seedlings grafting.”
e2“aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting”
Claim · model-written summary
Aluminum binding saved time and effort.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
- Treatment
- aluminum binding graftinge2
- Outcome
- time and efforte1
- Direction
- savede1
- Comparator
- plastic strap binding graftinge2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“the application of aluminum was more convenient and quick,and saved time and effort,so it was recommended as a binding material in C.oleifera small seedlings grafting.”
e2“aluminum binding grafting and plastic strap binding grafting”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend aluminum for grafting small Camellia oleifera seedlings.
- Taxon
- Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferae0
- Outcome
- recommended as a binding material in C.oleifera small seedlings graftinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Using 1-year-old Camellia oleifera container seedlings as root stocks,andCenruan 3superior clones as scion”
e1“the application of aluminum was more convenient and quick,and saved time and effort,so it was recommended as a binding material in C.oleifera small seedlings grafting.”
The same questions in other papers
aluminium atom · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →grafting · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results
3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
grafting · growth · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results
4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →grafting · survival · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.