Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed rootstock had a survival rate of 93.33%, higher than CK.

A claim from Influence of different grafting methods on survival and shooting rate of Camellia oleifera Abe1. · 2013

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed rootstock had a survival rate of 93.33%, higher than CK.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
Seed rootstocke0
Outcome
survivale0
Direction
highere0
Value
93.33%e0
Comparator
CKe0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seed rootstock had higher survival and shooting rate than CK, which were 93.33% and 52.50%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1384
t0

“Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–90

Title

Influence of different grafting methods on survival and shooting rate of Camellia oleifera Abe1.

Tian DaQing; Liu Fan-zhi; Lei ChaoYun; et al. Nanfang nongye xuebao 2013

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e8284eb6ce5fea67ad667fdf19ba014043194421f27f125e9178aa731050d78d · schema claims-v0.9 · position 7 in the model’s answer

grafting · survival · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 10 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.