Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Grafting on container tender rootstock gave the best sold seedlings and economic benefit of Camellia oleifera compared with the other three methods.

A claim from Comparison Tests on Seedling Cultivation of Camellia oleifera · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on container tender rootstock gave the best sold seedlings and economic benefit of Camellia oleifera compared with the other three methods.

Taxon
Camellia oleiferaCamellia oleiferat0
Treatment
grafting on container tender rootstocke1
Outcome
sold seedlings and economic benefite1
Direction
was the beste1
Comparator
other three methodse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Camellia oleifera
Camellia oleifera · TaxonUSDA Agricultural Research Service · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Comparison Tests on Seedling Cultivation of Camellia oleifera”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–61
e1

“The result demonstrated that survival rate,conservation rate of seedling,seedling growth,sold seedlings and economic benefit of seedling cultivation by grafting on container tender rootstock was the best than by the other three methods.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–546

Title

Comparison Tests on Seedling Cultivation of Camellia oleifera

Long Wei Zhejiang linye keji 2012

Other claims from this paper (1)

Record rev-a086fe2dede94c05ea35c37918c32478bb097cda43386836bd89937c25215b21 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

grafting · yield · Camellia oleifera (tea-oil Camellia)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.