Abstract
An investigation was carried out to test the effect of wheat/soybean intercropping on iron accumulation and mobilization in root apoplast, and its role of improving iron nutrition of soybean. There were two treatments: soybean monocropping and wheat/soybean intercropping. The plants were grown in sandy soil in pots with two compartments separated by 0.45 μm or 30 μm nylon nets, a central one for root growth and outer ones for soil. The results demonstrated that intercropping improved iron nutrition of soybean. Under the conditions that soybean roots were separated by nylon nets and intercropped with wheat the chlorophyll content of young leaves, iron content of shoot and root of soybean all were more than those of monocropping treatment; and intercropping increased the content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybean, that was two times higher than monocropping one. By the way the content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybean and wheat under 0.45 μm nylon nets were lower than under 30 μm nylon nets.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping improved soybean iron nutrition.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- wheat/soybean intercroppinge1
- Outcome
- iron nutritione0
- Direction
- improvede0
- Comparator
- soybean monocroppinge1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping improved iron nutrition of soybean.”
e1“soybean monocropping and wheat/soybean intercropping”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had higher young-leaf chlorophyll content than monocropped soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercropped with wheate1
- Outcome
- chlorophyll content of young leavese0
- Direction
- more thane0
- Comparator
- monocropping treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the chlorophyll content of young leaves, iron content of shoot and root of soybean all were more than those of monocropping treatment”
e1“intercropped with wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropped soybean had higher shoot and root iron content than monocropped soybean.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercropped with wheate1
- Outcome
- iron content of shoot and roote0
- Direction
- more thane0
- Comparator
- monocropping treatmente0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“iron content of shoot and root of soybean all were more than those of monocropping treatment”
e1“intercropped with wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping doubled the soybean root apoplastic iron pool relative to monocropping.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- intercroppinge0
- Outcome
- content of root apoplastic iron poolse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- two timese0
- Comparator
- monocroppinge0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“intercropping increased the content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybean, that was two times higher than monocropping one.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean root apoplastic iron pools were lower with 0.45 μm than 30 μm nets.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- 0.45 μm nylon netse0
- Outcome
- content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybeane0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- 30 μm nylon netse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybean and wheat under 0.45 μm nylon nets were lower than under 30 μm nylon nets.”
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat root apoplastic iron pools were lower with 0.45 μm than 30 μm nets.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 0.45 μm nylon netse0
- Outcome
- content of root apoplastic iron poolse0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- 30 μm nylon netse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the content of root apoplastic iron pools of soybean and wheat under 0.45 μm nylon nets were lower than under 30 μm nylon nets.”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · physiology: pigments · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →intercropping · molecular: metabolites · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →intercropping · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.