Abstract
Two factors and two levels test was carried out to study the dehydration and rice quality characteristic of single cropping jopanica during low-temperature hot air drying after irradiation by lowdose 60Co Gamma ray of 0.6kGy.The result showed that after the pre-treatment by dose Gamma ray of 0.6kGy,the dehydration date of rice was lightly increased during drying,and the drying time was clearly shorten.In addition,it had little influence on processing quality and nutritional quality of rice,however could make up for some degree of loss of rice quality heated-air drying and improved cooking and eating quality of rice.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation lightly increased the dehydration date of rice during drying.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- pre-treatment by dose Gamma ray of 0.6kGye0
- Outcome
- dehydration datee0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after the pre-treatment by dose Gamma ray of 0.6kGy,the dehydration date of rice was lightly increased during drying”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation clearly shortened rice drying time.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Treatment
- pre-treatment by dose Gamma ray of 0.6kGye0
- Outcome
- drying timee0
- Direction
- shortene0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“after the pre-treatment by dose Gamma ray of 0.6kGy,the dehydration date of rice was lightly increased during drying,and the drying time was clearly shorten”
t0“rice quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation had little influence on rice processing and nutritional quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- processing quality and nutritional quality of ricee0
- Direction
- little influencee0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“it had little influence on processing quality and nutritional quality of rice”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation partly offset quality loss from heated-air drying.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativat0
- Outcome
- rice qualitye0
- Direction
- make up for some degree of losse0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“could make up for some degree of loss of rice quality heated-air drying”
t0“rice quality”
Claim · model-written summary
Irradiation improved rice cooking and eating quality.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Outcome
- cooking and eating quality of ricee0
- Direction
- improvede0
Not reportedTreatmentComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“improved cooking and eating quality of rice”
The same questions in other papers
radiation · quality: postharvest · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.