Paper · 2010 · Shandong Nongye Daxue xuebao

EFFECTS OF POLYMER/SULFUR COATED UREA (PSCU) ON WHEAT GROWTH

Wenliang Wu

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper investigated effects of polymer/sulfur coated urea on number of tillering,proportion of chlorophyll,number of ears of grain,thousand-grain weight,yield,grain protein content and fertilizer use efficiency by field experiment.The results showed that comparison to normal urea,polymer/sulfur coated urea which was used as base fertilizer with a release period of four months could achieve same effects on number of tillering,number of grain ears and wheat yield with 20% and 40% less use level,while thousand-grain weight,grain protein yield and fertilizer use efficiency significantly increased.The results also showed that using polymer/sulfur coated urea as base fertilizer once had better outcome than using it as base and additional dressing fertilizer separately.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea maintained tiller number at 20% and 40% lower use rates than normal urea.

Treatment
polymer/sulfur coated ureae0
Outcome
number of tilleringe0
Direction
same effectse0
Value
20% and 40%e0
Qualifier
release period of four monthse0
Comparator
normal ureae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“comparison to normal urea,polymer/sulfur coated urea which was used as base fertilizer with a release period of four months could achieve same effects on number of tillering,number of grain ears and wheat yield with 20% and 40% less use level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea maintained grain ear number at lower use rates.

Treatment
polymer/sulfur coated ureae0
Outcome
number of grain earse0
Direction
same effectse0
Value
20% and 40%e0
Comparator
normal ureae0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“comparison to normal urea,polymer/sulfur coated urea which was used as base fertilizer with a release period of four months could achieve same effects on number of tillering,number of grain ears and wheat yield with 20% and 40% less use level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea maintained wheat yield at lower use rates.

Treatment
polymer/sulfur coated ureae0
Outcome
wheat yielde0
Direction
same effectse0
Value
20% and 40%e0
Comparator
normal ureae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“comparison to normal urea,polymer/sulfur coated urea which was used as base fertilizer with a release period of four months could achieve same effects on number of tillering,number of grain ears and wheat yield with 20% and 40% less use level”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–501 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea significantly increased thousand-grain weight.

Outcome
thousand-grain weighte0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while thousand-grain weight,grain protein yield and fertilizer use efficiency significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea significantly increased grain protein yield.

Outcome
grain protein yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while thousand-grain weight,grain protein yield and fertilizer use efficiency significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Coated urea significantly increased fertilizer use efficiency.

Outcome
fertilizer use efficiencye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonTreatmentComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while thousand-grain weight,grain protein yield and fertilizer use efficiency significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

One basal application of coated urea had better outcomes than split basal and additional dressing.

Treatment
polymer/sulfur coated urea as base fertilizer oncee0
Outcome
better outcomee0
Direction
better outcomee0
Comparator
using it as base and additional dressing fertilizer separatelye0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“using polymer/sulfur coated urea as base fertilizer once had better outcome than using it as base and additional dressing fertilizer separately”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 633–776 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

1,736 papers in the same direction as this paper · 285 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.