Paper · 2014 · Journal of Changjiang Vegetables

Effects of Different Grafting Methods on Growth of Oriental Melon

Qu Wang

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this paper, we compared the survival rates of grafted oriental melon seedlings by using four grafting methods cuttage grafting, approach grafting, wedge grafting and oblique grafting. The results showed that, the wedge grafting treatment had highest seedling survival rate of 90.0%, which was 7.7% higher than that of commonly-used cuttage grafting method, and the leaf number, leaf size, plant height and flowering stage of the wedge grafting treatment were next only to those of approach grafting treatment, but its stem was significantly thicker than that of the other three treatments. The wedge grafting treatment also had the highest yield of 3 540.4 kg/667 m2, which was 5.82% and 0.87% higher than those of the cuttage grafting treatment and approach grafting treatment respectively. In addition, the labor and management cost of wedge grafting treatment was lower than that of the approach grafting treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge grafting had the highest melon seedling survival, 90.0%, 7.7% above cuttage grafting.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente0
Outcome
seedling survival ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
90.0%e0
Qualifier
7.7%e0
Comparator
cuttage grafting methode0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the wedge grafting treatment had highest seedling survival rate of 90.0%, which was 7.7% higher than that of commonly-used cuttage grafting method”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 212–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge grafting ranked below approach grafting for leaf number, leaf size, plant height and flowering stage.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente0
Outcome
leaf number, leaf size, plant height and flowering stagee0
Direction
next only toe0
Comparator
approach grafting treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the leaf number, leaf size, plant height and flowering stage of the wedge grafting treatment were next only to those of approach grafting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–511 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge-grafted stems were significantly thicker than stems under the other three methods.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente1
Outcome
steme0
Direction
thickere0
Comparator
the other three treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“but its stem was significantly thicker than that of the other three treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 513–591 · show in text ↑
e1

“leaf number, leaf size, plant height and flowering stage of the wedge grafting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–456 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge grafting produced the highest yield, 3 540.4 kg/667 m2, 5.82% above cuttage grafting.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3 540.4 kg/667 m2e0
Qualifier
5.82%e0
Comparator
cuttage grafting treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wedge grafting treatment also had the highest yield of 3 540.4 kg/667 m2, which was 5.82% and 0.87% higher than those of the cuttage grafting treatment and approach grafting treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge grafting yield was 0.87% above approach grafting.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.87%e0
Comparator
approach grafting treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The wedge grafting treatment also had the highest yield of 3 540.4 kg/667 m2, which was 5.82% and 0.87% higher than those of the cuttage grafting treatment and approach grafting treatment respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 593–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wedge grafting had lower labor and management cost than approach grafting.

Taxon
Oriental MelonCucumis melot0
Treatment
wedge grafting treatmente0
Outcome
labor and management coste0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
approach grafting treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis melo
Cucumis melo · TaxonUSDA photo by Scott Bauer. Image Number K7355-11. · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the labor and management cost of wedge grafting treatment was lower than that of the approach grafting treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–920 · show in text ↑
t0

“Oriental Melon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 51–65 · show in text ↑

grafting · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Results differ

34 papers: 30 positive, 4 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 34 positive, 5 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.