Abstract
Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum.While treating with AM fungi,Eucalyptus Seedlings could not occur of little occur in wilt disease damage.The results,injected Pseudomonas solanacearum bacteria for a series of Eucalyptus seedlings,showed that disease percentage of inoculated seedlings decreased by 10.0%～40.0%,and seedling increased by 12%～39% in height growth.AM fungus effectiveness was better than that of ECT mycorrhizal fungi,the isolate AM6008 and AM9004 were better fungi to resist the wilt bacteria,followed by AM3006.Field trial results indicated that mycorrhizal seedlings could improve resistance against the bacteria,and the disease percentage decreased by 10.0%～17.5%,although environmental factors were more different.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi inoculation increased Eucalyptus seedling resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus Seedlings
.jpg?width=60)
Eucalyptuse1 - Treatment
- inoculated with AM fungie1
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas solanacearume1pathogen
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearume1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e1“Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi inoculation decreased wilt disease percentage of Eucalyptus seedlings by 10.0%～40.0%.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus seedlingse2
- Treatment
- inoculated with AM fungie1
- Interactor
- Pseudomonas solanacearume2pathogen
- Second interactor
- AM fungiGlomeromycotae1symbiont
- Outcome
- disease percentagee2
- Direction
- decreasede2
- Value
- 10.0%～40.0%e2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e1“Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum”
e2“injected Pseudomonas solanacearum bacteria for a series of Eucalyptus seedlings,showed that disease percentage of inoculated seedlings decreased by 10.0%～40.0%”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungus effectiveness was better than that of ECT mycorrhizal fungi.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptust0
- Treatment
- AM funguse3
- Outcome
- effectivenesse3
- Direction
- bettere3
- Comparator
- ECT mycorrhizal fungie3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eucalyptus Seedlings”
e3“AM fungus effectiveness was better than that of ECT mycorrhizal fungi”
Claim · model-written summary
Isolates AM6008 and AM9004 were better at resisting the wilt bacteria than other AM isolates.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptust0
- Material
- AM6008 and AM9004e4
- Outcome
- resist the wilt bacteriae4
- Direction
- bettere4
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eucalyptus Seedlings”
e4“the isolate AM6008 and AM9004 were better fungi to resist the wilt bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
Mycorrhizal seedlings improved resistance against the bacteria in field trials.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptust0
- Treatment
- inoculated with AM fungie1
- Outcome
- resistance against the bacteriae5
- Direction
- improvee5
- Setting
- Field triale5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eucalyptus Seedlings”
e1“Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum”
e5“Field trial results indicated that mycorrhizal seedlings could improve resistance against the bacteria”
Claim · model-written summary
In field trials, mycorrhizal seedlings decreased the disease percentage by 10.0%～17.5%, although environmental factors differed more.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptust0
- Treatment
- inoculated with AM fungie1
- Outcome
- disease percentagee6
- Direction
- decreasede6
- Value
- 10.0%～17.5%e6
- Qualifier
- although environmental factors were more differente6
- Setting
- Field triale5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eucalyptus Seedlings”
e1“Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum”
e5“Field trial results indicated that mycorrhizal seedlings could improve resistance against the bacteria”
e6“the disease percentage decreased by 10.0%～17.5%,although environmental factors were more different”
Claim · model-written summary
AM fungi inoculation increased height growth of Eucalyptus seedlings by 12%～39%.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptust0
- Treatment
- inoculated with AM fungie1
- Outcome
- height growthe7
- Direction
- increasede7
- Value
- 12%～39%e7
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Eucalyptus Seedlings”
e1“Eucalyptus Seedlings inoculated with AM fungi could increase resistance against Pseudomonas solanacearum”
e7“seedling increased by 12%～39% in height growth”
Claim · model-written summary
Eucalyptus seedlings treated with AM fungi had little wilt disease damage.
- Taxon
- Eucalyptus SeedlingsEucalyptuse0
- Treatment
- treating with AM fungie0
- Outcome
- wilt disease damagee0
- Direction
- little occure0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“While treating with AM fungi,Eucalyptus Seedlings could not occur of little occur in wilt disease damage”
The same questions in other papers
inoculation · disease · EucalyptusPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · EucalyptusPositive and negative results
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →inoculation · growth · EucalyptusPositive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
12 papers more in this group
See all 16 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.