Paper · 2013

Effect of Different Cultivation Factors on Kenaf Fiber Yield

Liu Z

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

3 main kenaf cultivars were experimented in the fields with different planting densities and fertilizers in the main cultivation areas in Anhui province.According to the results of fiber yield,the best planting density was 14000 plants per 667m2.H318 could get the highest fiber yield among the three cultivars.Base fertilizer had no influence on the fiber yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The best planting density of 14000 plants per 667m2 gave the highest kenaf fiber yield.

Treatment
14000 plants per 667m2e1
Outcome
fiber yielde1
Direction
higherinferrede1
Setting
Anhui provincee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 main kenaf cultivars were experimented in the fields with different planting densities and fertilizers in the main cultivation areas in Anhui province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e1

“According to the results of fiber yield,the best planting density was 14000 plants per 667m2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 153–245 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Kenaf cultivar H318 had the highest fiber yield among the three cultivars.

Material
H318e2
Outcome
fiber yielde2
Direction
higheste2
Comparator
the three cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 main kenaf cultivars were experimented in the fields with different planting densities and fertilizers in the main cultivation areas in Anhui province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e2

“H318 could get the highest fiber yield among the three cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Base fertilizer had no influence on kenaf fiber yield.

Treatment
Base fertilizere3
Outcome
fiber yielde3
Direction
no influencee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hibiscus cannabinus
Hibiscus cannabinus · TaxonRleo4Guido · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“3 main kenaf cultivars were experimented in the fields with different planting densities and fertilizers in the main cultivation areas in Anhui province”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–152 · show in text ↑
e3

“Base fertilizer had no influence on the fiber yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 311–362 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: grain · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.