Abstract
The effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality using a pot experiment were studied to investigate the character of water and fertilizer use, so as to provide rational irrigation and fertilization for high yield and high efficient cultivation of kenaf. The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly. Therefore, the best strategy of irrigation and fertilization mode was low fertilization(N 0.15 g/kg soil, P2O50.075 g/kg soil and K2 O 0.15 g/kg soil) with all NK fertilizer as base fertilization, and middle irrigation in seedling stage,high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilization maximized fiber yield, length, and width.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Treatment
- low fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- fiber yield, fiber length and widthe0
- Direction
- maximumse0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Low fertilization did not significantly reduce fiber strength or line density.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- low fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- fiber strength and fiber line densitye0
- Direction
- no significant reductione0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer improved fiber yield and linear density.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- All NK fertilizer as base fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- fiber yield and linear densitye0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Applying all NK fertilizer as base fertilizer did not significantly reduce fiber strength.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- All NK fertilizer as base fertilizatione0
- Outcome
- fiber strengthe0
- Direction
- did not reduce significantlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Middle seedling irrigation followed by high irrigation gave higher fiber yield, strength and length than other treatments.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stagee0
- Outcome
- fiber yield, strength and lengthe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
This irrigation schedule did not significantly decrease fiber linear density.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stagee0
- Outcome
- fiber linear densitye0
- Direction
- did not decrease significantlye0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that:(1) In low fertilization, fiber yield, fiber length and width reached the maximums, and fiber strength and fiber line density had no significant reduction.(2) All NK fertilizer as base fertilization was beneficial to improve the fiber yield and linear density, while fiber strength did not reduce significantly.(3) Middle irrigation in seedling stage, high irrigation in vigorous growth stage and squaring and fruit stage,fiber yield, strength and length were higher than those of other treatments, and the fiber linear density did not decrease significantly.”
t0“kenaf”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
fertilization · quality: grain · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.