Abstract
Through the pot experiment,has researched the effect of different irrigating level in different stage to the growth and yield of kenaf.Based on two kenaf varieties as Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,the treatment included three factors of growing stages as the seeding stage(A)with 3 irrigation levels as high water(A1),middle water(A2)and low water(A3);the vigorous growing stage(B)with 3 irrigation levels as high water(B1),middle water(B2)and low water(B3);the blossom bud stage(C)with 3 irrigation levels as high water(C1),middle water(C2)and low water(C3).Whole experiment adopted the Orthogonal design with randomized blocks and three repetitions.The results showed that:(1)The variety and the different irrigating level in,vigorous stage and blossom bud stage presented the significant effect to the dry matter production of kenaf.The effect sequence of irrigating level in different growth stage to kenaf yield as follows:Vigorous growing stageblossom bud stageseedling stage.The difference of the variety was Hongyou 2Fuhong 992.For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;compared with C3,the fiber dry mass of C1 and C2 was also increased 44.7% and 17.45%,20.39% and 5.00%,respec-tively.(2)Compared with B3,the plant height,stem diameter,bark thickness,main root length,dry mass aboveground of B1 and B2 total were increased,also each index of B1 were higher than B2,except the ratio of root and mass above-ground.(3)Compared with C3,the plant height,dry mass above-ground and dermal bone ratio of C1 and C2 were increased.The bark thickness and dry mass above-ground of C1 were higher than C2,which difference was notable.Under the conditions of this test,for two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,the high water level in vigorous stage and blossom bud stage was useful to the accumulation of fiber dry mass,the difference was notable.But the different irrigating level in seedling stage was not notable to the fiber dry mass.Through the range analysis method,the optimal irrigation level combination in different growing stages was B1C1A1.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 17
Claim · model-written summary
Variety and irrigation level during vigorous growth and blossom bud stages significantly affected kenaf dry matter production.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinuse0 - Treatment
- different irrigating levele0
- Outcome
- dry matter production of kenafe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The variety and the different irrigating level in,vigorous stage and blossom bud stage presented the significant effect to the dry matter production of kenaf.”
Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation influence on kenaf yield ranked vigorous growth above blossom bud above seedling stage.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinuse0
- Outcome
- kenaf yielde0
- Qualifier
- Vigorous growing stageblossom bud stageseedling stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The effect sequence of irrigating level in different growth stage to kenaf yield as follows:Vigorous growing stageblossom bud stageseedling stage.”
Claim · model-written summary
Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992 differed in yield response.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Outcome
- difference of the varietye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The difference of the variety was Hongyou 2Fuhong 992.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with B3, B1 increased fiber dry mass in Hongyou 2 by 122.31%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- B1e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 122.31%e0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with B3, B2 increased fiber dry mass in Hongyou 2 by 130.24%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- B2e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 130.24%e0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with B3, B1 increased fiber dry mass in Fuhong 992 by 49.27%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Fuhong 992e0
- Treatment
- B1e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 49.27%e0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with B3, B2 increased fiber dry mass in Fuhong 992 by 73.81%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Fuhong 992e0
- Treatment
- B2e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 73.81%e0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with C3, C1 increased fiber dry mass in Hongyou 2 by 44.7%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 44.7%e0
- Comparator
- C3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the two varieties of Hongyou 2 and Fuhong 992,compared with the irrigating level B3,the fiber dry mass of B1 and B2 was increased122.31% and 130.24%,49.27% and73.81%,respectively;compared with C3,the fiber dry mass of C1 and C2 was also increased 44.7% and 17.45%,20.39% and 5.00%,respec-tively.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with C3, C2 increased fiber dry mass in Hongyou 2 by 17.45%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- C2e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 17.45%e0
- Comparator
- C3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with C3,the fiber dry mass of C1 and C2 was also increased 44.7% and 17.45%,20.39% and 5.00%,respec-tively.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with C3, C1 increased fiber dry mass in Fuhong 992 by 20.39%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 20.39%e0
- Comparator
- C3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with C3,the fiber dry mass of C1 and C2 was also increased 44.7% and 17.45%,20.39% and 5.00%,respec-tively.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Compared with C3, C2 increased fiber dry mass in Fuhong 992 by 5.00%.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- C2e0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 5.00%e0
- Comparator
- C3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“compared with C3,the fiber dry mass of C1 and C2 was also increased 44.7% and 17.45%,20.39% and 5.00%,respec-tively.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
B1 and B2 increased plant height, stem diameter and bark thickness relative to B3, with B1 higher than B2.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- B1 and B2e0
- Outcome
- plant height,stem diameter,bark thicknesse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with B3,the plant height,stem diameter,bark thickness,main root length,dry mass aboveground of B1 and B2 total were increased,also each index of B1 were higher than B2,except the ratio of root and mass above-ground.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
B1 and B2 increased main root length and aboveground dry mass relative to B3.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- B1 and B2e0
- Outcome
- main root length,dry mass abovegrounde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- B3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with B3,the plant height,stem diameter,bark thickness,main root length,dry mass aboveground of B1 and B2 total were increased,also each index of B1 were higher than B2,except the ratio of root and mass above-ground.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
C1 and C2 increased plant height, aboveground dry mass and dermal bone ratio relative to C3.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- C1 and C2e0
- Outcome
- plant height,dry mass above-ground and dermal bone ratioe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- C3e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared with C3,the plant height,dry mass above-ground and dermal bone ratio of C1 and C2 were increased.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
C1 gave notably higher bark thickness and aboveground dry mass than C2.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- C1e0
- Outcome
- bark thickness and dry mass above-grounde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- C2e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The bark thickness and dry mass above-ground of C1 were higher than C2,which difference was notable.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Seedling-stage irrigation level did not notably affect fiber dry mass.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- different irrigating level in seedling stagee0
- Outcome
- fiber dry masse0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the different irrigating level in seedling stage was not notable to the fiber dry mass.”
t0“kenaf”
Claim · model-written summary
Range analysis selected B1C1A1 as the optimal irrigation combination.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- B1C1A1e0
- Outcome
- optimal irrigation level combinatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Through the range analysis method,the optimal irrigation level combination in different growing stages was B1C1A1.”
t0“kenaf”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.