Abstract
【Objective 】The effects of irrigation and fertilization management on fiber yield and quality were studied to investigate the character of water and fertilizer use and provide rational irrigation and fertilization for high yield and high efficient cultivation of kenaf. 【 Method 】 The field experiments included two kenaf varieties, i. e. Fuhong 992 and Hongyou 2; 2 irrigation modes,i.e. furrow irrigation(F) and drip irrigation(D); 3 fertilization modes,i.e. T1(60%N fertilizers as basal fertilizer),T2(40% N fertilizers as basal fertilizer),T3(20% N fertilizers as basal fertilizer). No irrigation or fertilization was set for CK treatment. 【 Result 】 The fiber yield of DT2 treatment of Hongyou 2 was the highest, which was 14.5 t/ha, and it was significantly higher than the other treatments(P 0.05, the same as below).Fiber yield of T1 and T2treatment on drip irrigation was higher than the treatment on furrow irrigation. Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT1 treatment of Hongyou 2 were the highest, which was 484.1 N and 8.580 T. Fiber strength and fiber linear density of T1 and T2treatment under furrow irrigation were significantly higher than those on drip irrigation treatment. The fiber yield of FT2 treatment of Fuhong 992 was the highest, which was 11.5 t/ha. With the same fertilization methods, the effects of different irrigation methods on yield were not significant( P 0. 05, the same as below). Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT3 treatment of Fuhong 992 were the highest, which was 448.3N and 7.327 T. With the same fertilization modes, different irrigation methods on fiber strength and fiber linear density were not significantly affected. 【 Conclusion 】 The yield and quality of Hongyou 2 are better under DT2 and FT1combined treatment, and the yield and quality of Fuhong are better under FT2 treatment.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Hongyou 2 had its highest fiber yield under DT2, at 14.5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- kenaf
Hibiscus cannabinust0 - Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- DT2 treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 14.5 t/hae0
- Comparator
- other treatmentse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“The fiber yield of DT2 treatment of Hongyou 2 was the highest, which was 14.5 t/ha, and it was significantly higher than the other treatments”
Claim · model-written summary
Under drip irrigation, T1 and T2 yielded more fiber than under furrow irrigation.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Treatment
- T1 and T2treatment on drip irrigatione0
- Outcome
- Fiber yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- treatment on furrow irrigatione0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“Fiber yield of T1 and T2treatment on drip irrigation was higher than the treatment on furrow irrigation”
Claim · model-written summary
Hongyou 2 FT1 gave maximum fiber strength of 484.1 N.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- FT1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- Fiber strengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 484.1 Ne0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT1 treatment of Hongyou 2 were the highest, which was 484.1 N and 8.580 T”
Claim · model-written summary
Hongyou 2 FT1 gave maximum fiber linear density of 8.580 T.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Hongyou 2e0
- Treatment
- FT1 treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber linear densitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 8.580 Te0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT1 treatment of Hongyou 2 were the highest, which was 484.1 N and 8.580 T”
Claim · model-written summary
Fuhong 992 FT2 had maximum fiber yield of 11.5 t/ha.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Fuhong 992e0
- Treatment
- FT2 treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 11.5 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“The fiber yield of FT2 treatment of Fuhong 992 was the highest, which was 11.5 t/ha”
Claim · model-written summary
Fuhong 992 FT3 had maximum fiber strength of 448.3N.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Fuhong 992e0
- Treatment
- FT3 treatmente0
- Outcome
- Fiber strengthe0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 448.3Ne0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT3 treatment of Fuhong 992 were the highest, which was 448.3N and 7.327 T”
Claim · model-written summary
Fuhong 992 FT3 had maximum fiber linear density of 7.327 T.
- Taxon
- kenafHibiscus cannabinust0
- Material
- Fuhong 992e0
- Treatment
- FT3 treatmente0
- Outcome
- fiber linear densitye0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 7.327 Te0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“kenaf”
e0“Fiber strength and fiber linear density of FT3 treatment of Fuhong 992 were the highest, which was 448.3N and 7.327 T”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: grain · Hibiscus cannabinus (kenaf)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.