Abstract
According to complete randomized block design,the experiment was carried out to study the effects of intercropping and mixture modes on forage yield and quality of oat and alfalfa in Yangling town of Shanxi Province.A total of six different modes were analyzed under low soil nitrogen environment.The results showed that the mixture treatments almost have no effect on the height,FW/DW and stalk/leaf of the mixture forage.The mode of intercropping is better than that of mixture and the oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 is the best combination.At this condition,the dry forage yield and crud protein of oat and alfalfa were the highest by mowing at milk stage of oat.Compared to oat monoculture,the best planting mode was intercropping of oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 by which dry forage yield 457g/m2 and crud protein(38.44g/m2)were increased by 12% and 8.6%,respectively.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
Mixture treatments had almost no effect on forage height, fresh to dry weight, or stalk to leaf ratio.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfa
Medicago sativa
Avena sativat0 - Treatment
- mixture treatmentse0
- Outcome
- height,FW/DW and stalk/leafe0
- Direction
- almost have no effecte0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The results showed that the mixture treatments almost have no effect on the height,FW/DW and stalk/leaf of the mixture forage.”
t0“Oat and Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Intercropping was better than mixture, with oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 the best combination.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfaMedicago sativaAvena sativae0
- Outcome
- oat and alfalfa at 3∶1e0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- mixturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The mode of intercropping is better than that of mixture and the oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 is the best combination.”
Claim · model-written summary
At the 3∶1 ratio, mowing at the oat milk stage gave the highest dry forage yield.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfaMedicago sativaAvena sativae0
- Organ / stage
- milk stage of oate0
- Outcome
- dry forage yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At this condition,the dry forage yield and crud protein of oat and alfalfa were the highest by mowing at milk stage of oat.”
Claim · model-written summary
At the 3∶1 ratio, mowing at the oat milk stage gave the highest crude protein.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfaMedicago sativaAvena sativae0
- Organ / stage
- milk stage of oate0
- Outcome
- crud proteine0
- Direction
- higheste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“At this condition,the dry forage yield and crud protein of oat and alfalfa were the highest by mowing at milk stage of oat.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3∶1 intercrop yielded 457g/m2 dry forage, 12% above oat monoculture.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfaMedicago sativaAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- intercropping of oat and alfalfa at 3∶1e0
- Outcome
- dry forage yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 457g/m2e0
- Qualifier
- 12%e0
- Comparator
- oat monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to oat monoculture,the best planting mode was intercropping of oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 by which dry forage yield 457g/m2 and crud protein(38.44g/m2)were increased by 12% and 8.6%,respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
The 3∶1 intercrop produced 38.44g/m2 crude protein, 8.6% above oat monoculture.
- Taxon
- oat and alfalfaMedicago sativaAvena sativae0
- Treatment
- intercropping of oat and alfalfa at 3∶1e0
- Outcome
- crud proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 38.44g/m2e0
- Qualifier
- 8.6%e0
- Comparator
- oat monoculturee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Compared to oat monoculture,the best planting mode was intercropping of oat and alfalfa at 3∶1 by which dry forage yield 457g/m2 and crud protein(38.44g/m2)were increased by 12% and 8.6%,respectively.”
The same questions in other papers
Medicago sativa · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
6 papers more in this group
See all 10 papers →Medicago sativa · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Results agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
intercropping · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Results differ
7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
5 papers more in this group
See all 9 papers →intercropping · quality: protein · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →intercropping · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →intercropping · yield · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.