Paper · 2008 · Shanghai nongye xuebao

The growth,photosynthesis and fruit quality of different type cucumber varieties grafted on to pumpkin seedlings

Haijun Jin

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The 2 cucumber varieties,Europe-typeChunqiuwang and South China-typeHuza 6,were grafted respectively on the two pumpkin rootstocks of Zhongyuangongsheng Z101 and Shengzhen 3,and the growth,photosynthesis and fruit quality of the 4 grafting combinations were studied under greenhouse.The results showed that the plant height increment of grafted cucumber was obviously higher than that of self-root cucumber.Among the grafting combinations,the plant height had no obvious difference between Chunqiuwang/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101 and Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3,and the plant height of Huza 6/Shengzhen 3 was obviously higher than that of Huza 6/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101.The chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of grafted cucumber were higher than those of self-root cucumber.The soluble protein content in fruits of the two grafting combinations with the rootstock of Shengzhen 3 was higher than that of self-root cucumber,and the soluble sugar content in the grafting combinations except Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3 was higher than that of self-root cucumber,but the vitamin C content in fruits of all the grafting combinations was somewhat lower than that of self-root cucumber.Therefore,the growth vigor of grafted cucumber obviously improved and there were some differences in the plant growth vigor and nutritious substance content of fruit among different type cucumber varieties grafted on different rootstocks.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height increment of grafted cucumber was obviously higher than that of self-rooted cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
plant height incremente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-root cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the plant height increment of grafted cucumber was obviously higher than that of self-root cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 307–406 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height did not differ obviously between Chunqiuwang/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101 and Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Chunqiuwang/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
no obvious differencee0
Comparator
Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the plant height had no obvious difference between Chunqiuwang/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101 and Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–553 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Plant height of Huza 6/Shengzhen 3 was obviously higher than that of Huza 6/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Material
Huza 6/Shengzhen 3e0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Huza 6/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the plant height of Huza 6/Shengzhen 3 was obviously higher than that of Huza 6/Zhongyuangongsheng Z101”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–661 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of grafted cucumber were higher than those of self-rooted cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
chlorophyll content and photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-root cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The chlorophyll content and photosynthetic rate of grafted cucumber were higher than those of self-root cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–774 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble protein content in fruits of the two grafting combinations with Shengzhen 3 rootstock was higher than that of self-rooted cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
grafting combinations with the rootstock of Shengzhen 3e0
Outcome
soluble protein contente0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
self-root cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The soluble protein content in fruits of the two grafting combinations with the rootstock of Shengzhen 3 was higher than that of self-root cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–922 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble sugar content was higher than in self-rooted cucumber in the grafting combinations except Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafting combinationse0
Outcome
soluble sugar contente0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
except Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3e0
Comparator
self-root cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the soluble sugar content in the grafting combinations except Chunqiuwang/Shengzhen 3 was higher than that of self-root cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1055 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Vitamin C content in fruits of all grafting combinations was somewhat lower than that of self-rooted cucumber.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
grafting combinationse0
Outcome
vitamin C contente0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
self-root cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the vitamin C content in fruits of all the grafting combinations was somewhat lower than that of self-root cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1060–1175 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Growth vigor of grafted cucumber was obviously improved.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
graftede0
Outcome
growth vigore0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 62–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“the growth vigor of grafted cucumber obviously improved”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1241 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

grafting · quality: phytochemicals · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

grafting · physiology: photosynthesis · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.