Paper · 2011 · AUSTRALIAN JOURNAL OF BASIC AND APPLIED SCIENCES

Alleviation of Salt Injury of Cucumber Plant by Grafting onto Salt Tolerance Rootstock

Amal M. El-Shraiy; M.A.A. Mostafa; S. A. M. Zaghlool; et al.

12
claims
29
verbatim quotes
7
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Experiment was conducted in a greenhouse during the two successive seasons of 2008- 2009 and 2009-2010 to investigate the effect of grafting technique in improving salt tolerant of grafted cucumber plants (Cucumis sativus L. cv. falcon, Hybrid F1) under saline conditions. Samples were taken at 70 days after planting to determine plant growth, leaf electrolyte leakage percentage (Membrane Permeability) and leaf relative water content (LRWC). As well as, fruits yield and quality, biochemical analyses and antioxidant enzymes activity. Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin) significantly increased growth parameters by 44% and 69% for fresh weight, dry weigh by 41% and 69%, plant height 86% and 83% and leaf area by 102% and 57% in both season respectively and enhancement 12% and 13% in leaf relative water content (LRWC) as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season. Furthermore, These positive effects of grafting cucumber was correlated with significantly increased in chlorophyll, carotenoid, proline and total soluble protein concentrations. Although, grafting reduced membrane permeability and malondialdehyde (MDA) concentration in leaves of cucumber plants under salt stress conditions. As well as, improved fruit number, fruit weight, number of harvest and fruit yield comparing with ungrafted plants. As well as, Grafting increased PAL, POD, CAT, SOD, PPO and APX activities as compared to ungrafted plants under saline conditions. Excluding, grafted plants significantly reduced titratable acidity (TA %), total soluble solids (TSS %) and electrical conductivity (EC) in fruit juice as compared to ungrafted plants.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased cucumber fresh weight in both seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)e1
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
increasede1
Value
44% and 69%e0
Qualifier
both seasone2
Comparator
ungrafted cucumbere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“44% and 69% for fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–687 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–637 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased cucumber dry weigh in both seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)e1
Outcome
dry weighe0
Direction
increasede1
Value
41% and 69%e0
Qualifier
both seasone2
Comparator
ungrafted cucumbere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“dry weigh by 41% and 69%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 689–713 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–637 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased cucumber plant height in both seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)e1
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
increasede1
Value
86% and 83%e0
Qualifier
both seasone2
Comparator
ungrafted cucumbere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plant height 86% and 83%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 715–739 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–637 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased cucumber leaf area in both seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse1
Treatment
Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)e1
Outcome
leaf areae0
Direction
increasede1
Value
102% and 57%e0
Qualifier
both seasone2
Comparator
ungrafted cucumbere2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“leaf area by 102% and 57%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–769 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin) significantly increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–637 · show in text ↑
e2

“as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 864–912 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting enhanced leaf relative water content by 12% and 13% in the two seasons.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)e1
Outcome
leaf relative water content (LRWC)e0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
12% and 13%e0
Qualifier
both seasone0
Comparator
ungrafted cucumbere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“enhancement 12% and 13% in leaf relative water content (LRWC) as compared to ungrafted cucumber in both season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–912 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting of cucumber on salt tolerance rootstock (Shintosa Supreme pumpkin)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 538–613 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive grafting effects correlated with higher chlorophyll, carotenoid and proline concentrations.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
grafting cucumbere0
Outcome
chlorophyll, carotenoid, prolinee0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These positive effects of grafting cucumber was correlated with significantly increased in chlorophyll, carotenoid, proline and total soluble protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1092 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Positive grafting effects correlated with higher total soluble protein concentration.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
grafting cucumbere0
Outcome
total soluble protein concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“These positive effects of grafting cucumber was correlated with significantly increased in chlorophyll, carotenoid, proline and total soluble protein concentrations.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 927–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting improved cucumber fruit number, fruit weight and number of harvests.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge1
Outcome
fruit number, fruit weight, number of harveste0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved fruit number, fruit weight, number of harvest and fruit yield comparing with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting increased PAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting improved cucumber fruit yield.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge1
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
improvede0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“improved fruit number, fruit weight, number of harvest and fruit yield comparing with ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1253–1356 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grafting increased PAL”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1391 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased PAL, POD and CAT activities under salinity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
PAL, POD, CATe0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
saline conditionse0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased PAL, POD, CAT, SOD, PPO and APX activities as compared to ungrafted plants under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting increased SOD, PPO and APX activities under salinity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge0
Outcome
SOD, PPO and APX activitiese0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
saline conditionse0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grafting increased PAL, POD, CAT, SOD, PPO and APX activities as compared to ungrafted plants under saline conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1487 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting reduced fruit juice titratable acidity, soluble solids and electrical conductivity.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativust0
Organ / stage
fruit juicee0
Treatment
grafted plantse0
Outcome
titratable acidity (TA %), total soluble solids (TSS %) and electrical conductivity (EC)e0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
ungrafted plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“grafted plants significantly reduced titratable acidity (TA %), total soluble solids (TSS %) and electrical conductivity (EC) in fruit juice as compared to ungrafted plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1499–1672 · show in text ↑
t0

“Cucumber”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–38 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

salinity · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

80 papers: 9 positive, 71 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 71 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 1 positive, 9 negative or no effect

9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

grafting · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.