Paper · 2022 · BMC Plant Biology

Grafting enhances drought tolerance by regulating stress-responsive gene expression and antioxidant enzyme activities in cucumbers

Said A. Shehata; Hanaa S. Omar; Ahmed G. S. Elfaidy; et al.

8
claims
21
verbatim quotes
54
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Water scarcity is a major limiting factor for crop yield production in arid and water-stressed areas worldwide. Cucumber plants have a high transpiration ratio and are vulnerable to drought. Grafting commercial genotypes onto selected strong rootstocks has been useful in mitigating the effects of drought. Therefore, this study aimed to evaluate the possibility of using a novel rootstock plant's tolerance to water-deficit stress in inducing drought tolerance in cucumbers by activating the stress-response gene expression and the antioxidant system, which improved the cucumber quality and yield under water-deficit conditions. This field experiment was conducted for > 2 years, 2020 and 2021, with five drought stress tolerant genotypes (i.e., rootstock) and drought-sensitive genotype Luerans (i.e., a scion). They were subjected to various deficit irrigation levels for 12 days, and their agro-physiological and molecular responses to water-deficit stress were assessed. The results of the study showed that the agronomical parameters, including the leaf area (LA), leaf water content (LWC), number of leaves, plant height, root dry matter shoot dry matter, rates of leaf appearance and stem elongation, and total yield significantly increased with grafted cucumber plants than with non-grafted cucumber plants (control) under normal and stressful conditions.Similar results were observed in the physiological measurements in terms of antioxidant enzymes, abscisic acid levels, gibberellic acid content, and lower lipid peroxidation (malondialdehyde, MDA). Grafting of Luerans (section) on five rootstocks significantly raised the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and peroxidase), improved the gibberellic acid and proline accumulation, and reduced the content of lipid peroxidation and abscisic acid. Furthermore, the real-time polymerase chain reaction expression results revealed that transcript levels of the stress-response genes CsAGO1 and CsDCLs increased rapidly and continuously in five rootstock grafting. Concurrently, these findings suggest that grafting with local varieties of novel drought-tolerant rootstock genotypes could improve drought tolerance in drought-sensitive cucumber genotypes.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber plants had significantly increased leaf area, leaf water content and number of leaves compared with non-grafted plants under normal and stressful conditions.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber plantse1
Outcome
leaf area (LA), leaf water content (LWC), number of leavese1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
under normal and stressful conditionse1
Comparator
non-grafted cucumber plantse1
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“the agronomical parameters, including the leaf area (LA), leaf water content (LWC), number of leaves, plant height, root dry matter shoot dry matter, rates of leaf appearance and stem elongation, and total yield significantly increased with grafted cucumber plants than with non-grafted cucumber plants (control) under normal and stressful conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1364 · show in text ↑
e2

“This field experiment was conducted for > 2 years, 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber plants had significantly increased plant height, root dry matter and shoot dry matter compared with non-grafted plants under normal and stressful conditions.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber plantse1
Outcome
plant height, root dry matter shoot dry mattere1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
under normal and stressful conditionse1
Comparator
non-grafted cucumber plantse1
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“the agronomical parameters, including the leaf area (LA), leaf water content (LWC), number of leaves, plant height, root dry matter shoot dry matter, rates of leaf appearance and stem elongation, and total yield significantly increased with grafted cucumber plants than with non-grafted cucumber plants (control) under normal and stressful conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1364 · show in text ↑
e2

“This field experiment was conducted for > 2 years, 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafted cucumber plants had significantly increased rates of leaf appearance, stem elongation and total yield compared with non-grafted plants under normal and stressful conditions.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
grafted cucumber plantse1
Outcome
rates of leaf appearance and stem elongation, and total yielde1
Direction
significantly increasede1
Qualifier
under normal and stressful conditionse1
Comparator
non-grafted cucumber plantse1
Setting
field experimente2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e1

“the agronomical parameters, including the leaf area (LA), leaf water content (LWC), number of leaves, plant height, root dry matter shoot dry matter, rates of leaf appearance and stem elongation, and total yield significantly increased with grafted cucumber plants than with non-grafted cucumber plants (control) under normal and stressful conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1014–1364 · show in text ↑
e2

“This field experiment was conducted for > 2 years, 2020 and 2021”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 631–695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting on five rootstocks significantly raised the activity of antioxidant enzymes in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge3
Outcome
activity of antioxidant enzymese3
Direction
raisede3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafting of Luerans (section) on five rootstocks significantly raised the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1694 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting improved gibberellic acid and proline accumulation in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge3
Outcome
gibberellic acid and proline accumulatione4
Direction
improvede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafting of Luerans (section) on five rootstocks significantly raised the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1694 · show in text ↑
e4

“improved the gibberellic acid and proline accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1696–1750 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting reduced lipid peroxidation content and abscisic acid content in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
Graftinge3
Outcome
content of lipid peroxidation and abscisic acide5
Direction
reducede5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e3

“Grafting of Luerans (section) on five rootstocks significantly raised the activity of antioxidant enzymes (catalase and peroxidase)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1563–1694 · show in text ↑
e5

“reduced the content of lipid peroxidation and abscisic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1756–1815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Five rootstock grafting increased transcript levels of the stress-response genes CsAGO1 and CsDCLs rapidly and continuously in cucumber.

Taxon
cucumbersCucumis sativust0
Treatment
five rootstock graftinge6
Gene
CsAGO1 and CsDCLse6
Outcome
transcript levelse6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
rapidly and continuouslye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e6

“transcript levels of the stress-response genes CsAGO1 and CsDCLs increased rapidly and continuously in five rootstock grafting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1903–2029 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Grafting with local drought-tolerant rootstock genotypes could improve drought tolerance in drought-sensitive cucumber genotypes.

Taxon
cucumber genotypesCucumis sativuse7
Outcome
drought tolerancee7
Qualifier
grafting with local varieties of novel drought-tolerant rootstock genotypese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in cucumbers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 118–130 · show in text ↑
e7

“grafting with local varieties of novel drought-tolerant rootstock genotypes could improve drought tolerance in drought-sensitive cucumber genotypes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2073–2220 · show in text ↑

grafting · physiology: osmolytes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

15 papers: 10 positive, 5 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

grafting · yield · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

72 papers: 64 positive, 8 negative or no effect

63 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

68 papers more in this group

See all 72 papers →

grafting · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Positive and negative results

59 papers: 55 positive, 4 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

55 papers more in this group

See all 59 papers →

grafting · molecular: expression · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

7 papers: 7 positive, 0 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

grafting · physiology: oxidative · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

grafting · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.