Paper · 2010 · Hebei Nongye Daxue xuebao

Effects of cutting quality on the growth property and uniformity of chrysanthemums cut flowers

Jia Ting

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Quality of cut flowers was influenced profoundly by cutting in chrysanthemum(Dendranthema morifolium cv.'Jingba').According to growth data of cuttings with different quality level,we established plant growth simulation equations.The first grade cuttings required 15.2 days to arrive quick growth phase after plantation,and growth velocity was 1.55 cm per day.The simulation equations was: Y=91.012/[1+exp(2.627-0.085t)],r2=0.996.The time for the second grade cuttings was 16 days,and growth velocity was 1.51cm per day.The simulation equation was: Y=90.037/[1+exp(2.655-0.082t)],r2=0.998,the time for the third grade cuttings was 15.8 days,and the growth speed was 1.39 cm per day.The simulation equation was: Y=85.106/[1+exp(2.618-0.081t)],r2=0.996,linear relationship between height and fresh weight: Y=0.473x+56.27,r=0.89,linear relationship between height and time to florescence: Y=-1.19x+202.7,r=0.976,and the linear relationship between height and stemdiameter: Y=180.85x-37.71,r=0.919.Compared with the uniformity of height,fresh weight and the time to florescence,the cuttings after filtration performed much well than control.The model developed in this study can predict plant growth properties from standard cuttings and can be used for decision making to optimize uniformity-control for standard cut chrysanthemum production in greenhouse.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting quality profoundly influenced flower quality.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Material
cv.'Jingba'e0
Treatment
cuttinge0
Outcome
Quality of cut flowerse0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Quality of cut flowers was influenced profoundly by cutting in chrysanthemum(Dendranthema morifolium cv.'Jingba').”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–114 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade first grade cuttings reached rapid growth after 15.2 days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Material
first gradee0
Outcome
quick growth phasee0
Value
15.2e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The first grade cuttings required 15.2 days to arrive quick growth phase after plantation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 229–318 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade second grade cuttings reached rapid growth after 16 days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Material
second gradee0
Outcome
growthe0
Value
16e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The time for the second grade cuttings was 16 days,and growth velocity was 1.51cm per day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 429–519 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade third grade cuttings reached rapid growth after 15.8 days.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Material
third gradee0
Outcome
growthe0
Value
15.8e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the time for the third grade cuttings was 15.8 days,and the growth speed was 1.39 cm per day.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–681 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First-grade cuttings grew at 1.55 cm per day.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
growth velocitye0
Value
1.55 cm per daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth velocity was 1.55 cm per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 323–358 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second-grade cuttings grew at 1.51cm per day.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
growth velocitye0
Value
1.51cm per daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth velocity was 1.51cm per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–518 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Third-grade cuttings grew at 1.39 cm per day.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Outcome
growth speede0
Value
1.39 cm per daye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“growth speed was 1.39 cm per day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 648–680 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and fresh weight had a linear relation with r=0.89.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Value
r=0.89e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linear relationship between height and fresh weight: Y=0.473x+56.27,r=0.89”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 750–824 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and time to florescence had a linear relation with r=0.976.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
time to florescencee0
Value
r=0.976e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linear relationship between height and time to florescence: Y=-1.19x+202.7,r=0.976”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 825–907 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Height and stem diameter had a linear relation with r=0.919.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Organ / stage
heighte0
Outcome
stemdiametere0
Value
r=0.919e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“linear relationship between height and stemdiameter: Y=180.85x-37.71,r=0.919”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 916–992 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Filtered cuttings had better uniformity of height, fresh weight and flowering time than controls.

Taxon
chrysanthemumsChrysanthemumt0
Treatment
cuttings after filtratione0
Outcome
uniformity of height,fresh weight and the time to florescencee0
Direction
much welle0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with the uniformity of height,fresh weight and the time to florescence,the cuttings after filtration performed much well than control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1136 · show in text ↑
t0

“chrysanthemums”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–82 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The model predicted growth properties from standard cuttings for uniformity control.

Taxon
chrysanthemumChrysanthemume0
Outcome
predict plant growth propertiese0
Setting
greenhousee0

Not reportedComparatorValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Chrysanthemum
Chrysanthemum · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryLucia Condac · CC BY 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The model developed in this study can predict plant growth properties from standard cuttings and can be used for decision making to optimize uniformity-control for standard cut chrysanthemum production in greenhouse.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1352 · show in text ↑