Paper · 2015 · Hubei nongye kexue

Effects of Different Types of Fertilizer Combined with N, P and K Fertilizers on the Yield and Quality of Sugarcane

LI Heng-ru

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied. The results showed that under equivalent fertilizer conditions, the effect of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P, K fertilizers was better than the effect of simple N, P, K fertilizers. The seedling emergence, tillering rate, the effective number of stems and cane yields of three sugarcane varieties under mineral fertilizer was better than that of complex fertilizer, compound fertilizer and conventional fertilizer. Mineral fertilizer treatment increased the yield of 3 varieties under equivalent fertilizer condition. After applying different types of fertilizers, different sugarcane varieties had various agronomic traits, especially the cane yields. 08 / 174(variety 1) with complex fertilizer(117 190.5 kg / hm2),compound fertilizer(118 572.0 kg / hm2), mineral fertilizer(132 873.0 kg / hm2) or conventional fertilizer(114 475.5 kg / hm2) was better than 08 / 186(variety 2), ROC 22(variety 3). It is indicated that 08 / 174 has better adaptability and higher utilization rate under various types of fertilizers.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Different fertilizer types combined with N, P and K fertilizers had a better effect than simple N, P and K fertilizers under equivalent fertilizer conditions.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
different types of fertilizers combined with N, P, K fertilizerse2
Outcome
effecte2
Direction
bettere2
Comparator
simple N, P, K fertilizerse2

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e2

“under equivalent fertilizer conditions, the effect of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P, K fertilizers was better than the effect of simple N, P, K fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 175–350 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer gave better seedling emergence, tillering rate and effective number of stems in three sugarcane varieties than complex, compound or conventional fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mineral fertilizere3
Outcome
seedling emergence, tillering rate, the effective number of stemse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
complex fertilizer, compound fertilizer and conventional fertilizere3

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seedling emergence, tillering rate, the effective number of stems and cane yields of three sugarcane varieties under mineral fertilizer was better than that of complex fertilizer, compound fertilizer and conventional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer gave better cane yields in three sugarcane varieties than complex, compound or conventional fertilizer.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
mineral fertilizere3
Outcome
cane yieldse3
Direction
bettere3
Comparator
complex fertilizer, compound fertilizer and conventional fertilizere3

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e3

“The seedling emergence, tillering rate, the effective number of stems and cane yields of three sugarcane varieties under mineral fertilizer was better than that of complex fertilizer, compound fertilizer and conventional fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 352–583 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mineral fertilizer treatment increased sugarcane yield of three varieties under equivalent fertilizer conditions.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Treatment
Mineral fertilizer treatmente4
Outcome
yielde4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e4

“Mineral fertilizer treatment increased the yield of 3 varieties under equivalent fertilizer condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 585–686 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 08/174 with complex fertilizer (117 190.5 kg/hm2) had higher cane yield than variety 08/186.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
08 / 174e5
Treatment
complex fertilizere5
Outcome
cane yieldse5
Direction
bettere5
Value
117 190.5 kg / hm2e5
Qualifier
ROC 22e5
Comparator
08 / 186e5

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“especially the cane yields. 08 / 174(variety 1) with complex fertilizer(117 190.5 kg / hm2),compound fertilizer(118 572.0 kg / hm2), mineral fertilizer(132 873.0 kg / hm2) or conventional fertilizer(114 475.5 kg / hm2) was better than 08 / 186(variety 2), ROC 22(variety 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 08/174 with compound fertilizer (118 572.0 kg/hm2) had higher cane yield than variety 08/186.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
08 / 174e5
Treatment
compound fertilizere5
Outcome
cane yieldse5
Direction
bettere5
Value
118 572.0 kg / hm2e5
Qualifier
ROC 22e5
Comparator
08 / 186e5

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“especially the cane yields. 08 / 174(variety 1) with complex fertilizer(117 190.5 kg / hm2),compound fertilizer(118 572.0 kg / hm2), mineral fertilizer(132 873.0 kg / hm2) or conventional fertilizer(114 475.5 kg / hm2) was better than 08 / 186(variety 2), ROC 22(variety 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 08/174 with mineral fertilizer (132 873.0 kg/hm2) had higher cane yield than variety 08/186.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
08 / 174e5
Treatment
mineral fertilizere5
Outcome
cane yieldse5
Direction
bettere5
Value
132 873.0 kg / hm2e5
Qualifier
ROC 22e5
Comparator
08 / 186e5

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“especially the cane yields. 08 / 174(variety 1) with complex fertilizer(117 190.5 kg / hm2),compound fertilizer(118 572.0 kg / hm2), mineral fertilizer(132 873.0 kg / hm2) or conventional fertilizer(114 475.5 kg / hm2) was better than 08 / 186(variety 2), ROC 22(variety 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1068 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 08/174 with conventional fertilizer (114 475.5 kg/hm2) had higher cane yield than variety 08/186.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
08 / 174e5
Treatment
conventional fertilizere5
Outcome
cane yieldse5
Direction
bettere5
Value
114 475.5 kg / hm2e5
Qualifier
ROC 22e5
Comparator
08 / 186e5

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e5

“especially the cane yields. 08 / 174(variety 1) with complex fertilizer(117 190.5 kg / hm2),compound fertilizer(118 572.0 kg / hm2), mineral fertilizer(132 873.0 kg / hm2) or conventional fertilizer(114 475.5 kg / hm2) was better than 08 / 186(variety 2), ROC 22(variety 3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Variety 08/174 has better adaptability and higher utilization rate under various fertilizer types.

Taxon
sugarcanee1
Material
08 / 174e6
Treatment
various types of fertilizerse6
Outcome
adaptability and higher utilization ratee6
Direction
bettere6

Verbatim

e1

“The effects of different types of fertilizers combined with N, P and K fertilizers on the yield and quality of sugarcane(Saccharum spp.) were studied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–149 · show in text ↑
e6

“08 / 174 has better adaptability and higher utilization rate under various types of fertilizers”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1091–1186 · show in text ↑

fertilization · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 129 positive, 18 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

346 papers: 312 positive, 34 negative or no effect

311 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

342 papers more in this group

See all 346 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.