Paper · 2009 · Anhui nongye kexue

Effects of Different Fertilization Methods on Soil Salinity and Cotton Development after Paddy to Dryland

Sun Chang-yu

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

[Objective] The aim was to provide the theoretical basis for high yield cultivation of cotton in saline land.[Method]With Jimian zajiaowang as the material and treatment without fertilizer as CK,5 kinds of fertilizer treatments(organic fertilizer①,common fertilization ②,common fertilization ③ organic fertilizer + common fertilization ②,organic fertilizer+ common fertilization ③) were designed.And the soil salinity was investigated at pre-sowing,post-seedling,3-leaf stage and budding stage,and the plant height and seedling rate were investigated at budding stage.[Result]The 2 common fertilizer treatments had little effect on soil salinity,and the change of soil salinity was similar with that of CK.In treatment with organic fertilizer,the soil salinity showed first decreasing and then rising trend,but its rising speed was slow.At budding stage, the plant height and seedling rate of cotton in treatment with organic fertilizer were 20.29% and 19.14% higher than those of CK resp,and were 17.63% and 13.91% higher than those of common fertilization treatments resp.[Conclusion] Application of organic fertilizer could delay the rise of soil salinity,increased seedling rate of cotton and was help to the development of cotton seedling.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The two common fertilizer treatments had little effect on soil salinity, which changed similarly to the unfertilized control.

Treatment
2 common fertilizer treatmentse0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
little effecte0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“The 2 common fertilizer treatments had little effect on soil salinity,and the change of soil salinity was similar with that of CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–705 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

With organic fertilizer, soil salinity first decreased and then rose slowly.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
soil salinitye0
Direction
first decreasing and then rising trende0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“In treatment with organic fertilizer,the soil salinity showed first decreasing and then rising trend,but its rising speed was slow”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 706–836 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At budding stage, cotton plant height with organic fertilizer was 20.29% higher than CK.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
20.29%e0
Qualifier
budding stagee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“At budding stage, the plant height and seedling rate of cotton in treatment with organic fertilizer were 20.29% and 19.14% higher than those of CK resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At budding stage, cotton seedling rate with organic fertilizer was 19.14% higher than CK.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
seedling ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
19.14%e0
Qualifier
budding stagee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“At budding stage, the plant height and seedling rate of cotton in treatment with organic fertilizer were 20.29% and 19.14% higher than those of CK resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton plant height with organic fertilizer was 17.63% higher than with common fertilization treatments.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere1
Value
17.63%e1
Qualifier
budding stagee0
Comparator
common fertilization treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“At budding stage, the plant height and seedling rate of cotton in treatment with organic fertilizer were 20.29% and 19.14% higher than those of CK resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“were 17.63% and 13.91% higher than those of common fertilization treatments resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1073 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cotton seedling rate with organic fertilizer was 13.91% higher than with common fertilization treatments.

Treatment
organic fertilizere0
Outcome
seedling ratee0
Direction
highere1
Value
13.91%e1
Qualifier
budding stagee0
Comparator
common fertilization treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Gossypium hirsutum
Gossypium hirsutum · TaxonChriKo · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Cotton”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
e0

“At budding stage, the plant height and seedling rate of cotton in treatment with organic fertilizer were 20.29% and 19.14% higher than those of CK resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–988 · show in text ↑
e1

“were 17.63% and 13.91% higher than those of common fertilization treatments resp”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1073 · show in text ↑

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · growth · Gossypium hirsutum (cotton)Positive and negative results

202 papers: 177 positive, 25 negative or no effect

176 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

198 papers more in this group

See all 202 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.