Abstract
A test about muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position was made within steel greenhouse in Beijing. The results showed that double vine pruning with 14 joint position fruit setting and single vine with 15 joint position fruit setting were the best in yield and fruit characteristics, followed by single vine with 12 and 9 joint position fruit setting. Double vine pruning with 2 fruit setting were not suitable in practical production.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Double-vine pruning with fruit set at joint 14 gave the best yield and fruit characteristics.
- Taxon
- muskmelon
.jpg?width=60)
Cucumis meloe0 - Treatment
- double vine pruning with 14 joint position fruit settinge1
- Outcome
- best in yield and fruit characteristicse1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position”
e1“double vine pruning with 14 joint position fruit setting and single vine with 15 joint position fruit setting were the best in yield and fruit characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Single-vine pruning with fruit set at joint 15 gave the best yield and fruit characteristics.
- Taxon
- muskmelonCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- single vine with 15 joint position fruit settinge1
- Outcome
- best in yield and fruit characteristicse1
- Direction
- beste1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position”
e1“double vine pruning with 14 joint position fruit setting and single vine with 15 joint position fruit setting were the best in yield and fruit characteristics”
Claim · model-written summary
Single-vine pruning with fruit set at joint 12 ranked after the best treatments.
- Taxon
- muskmelonCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- single vine with 12e1
- Outcome
- followed bye1
- Direction
- followed bye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position”
e1“followed by single vine with 12 and 9 joint position fruit setting”
Claim · model-written summary
Single-vine pruning with fruit set at joint 9 ranked after the best treatments.
- Taxon
- muskmelonCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- 9 joint position fruit settinge1
- Outcome
- followed bye1
- Direction
- followed bye1
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position”
e1“followed by single vine with 12 and 9 joint position fruit setting”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors advise against double-vine pruning with two fruits in production.
- Taxon
- muskmelonCucumis meloe0
- Treatment
- Double vine pruning with 2 fruit settinge1
- Outcome
- not suitable in practical productione1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“muskmelon(Cucumis melo L.)pruning way and fruit set position”
e1“Double vine pruning with 2 fruit setting were not suitable in practical production”
The same questions in other papers
pruning · yield · Cucumis melo (muskmelon)Positive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.