Paper · 2017 · South African Journal of Enology and Viticulture

Slow Dieback of Grapevine in South Africa: Stress-Related Predisposition of Young Vines for Infection by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum

Ferreira J.H.S.; van Wyk P.S.

4
claims
10
verbatim quotes
56
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum causes slow dieback of nursery vines and young vines in vineyards. In a greenhouse trial it was observed that significantly more inoculated Chenin blanc vines grafted onto rootstock 101-14 Mgt, and subjected to water stress, exhibited dieback symptoms. More plants eventually died compared to inoculated vines not subjected to stress. Inoculation technique (stem inoculation vs soil inoculation) did not significantly affect disease incidence. Extensive plugging of the xylem tissue in inoculated plants was observed, eventually leading to slow dieback of these vines.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stressed inoculated vines had significantly more dieback symptoms than unstressed inoculated vines.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Material
Chenin blance0
Treatment
water stresse0
Interactor
Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporumPhaeomoniella chlamydosporat0pathogen
Outcome
dieback symptomse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
inoculated vines not subjected to stresse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine in South Africa: Stress-Related Predisposition of Young Vines for Infection by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“significantly more inoculated Chenin blanc vines grafted onto rootstock 101-14 Mgt, and subjected to water stress, exhibited dieback symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–283 · show in text ↑
e1

“Compared to inoculated vines not subjected to stress.”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · abstract, characters 312–365 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

More water stressed inoculated vines eventually died than unstressed inoculated vines.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
water stresse1
Interactor
Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporumPhaeomoniella chlamydosporat0pathogen
Outcome
plants eventually diede0
Direction
Moree0
Comparator
inoculated vines not subjected to stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine in South Africa: Stress-Related Predisposition of Young Vines for Infection by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“More plants eventually died compared to inoculated vines not subjected to stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 284–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“significantly more inoculated Chenin blanc vines grafted onto rootstock 101-14 Mgt, and subjected to water stress, exhibited dieback symptoms.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 141–283 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Stem versus soil inoculation did not significantly change disease incidence.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Treatment
stem inoculatione0
Interactor
Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporumPhaeomoniella chlamydosporat0pathogen
Outcome
disease incidencee0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
soil inoculatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine in South Africa: Stress-Related Predisposition of Young Vines for Infection by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Inoculation technique (stem inoculation vs soil inoculation) did not significantly affect disease incidence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 366–474 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculated vines showed extensive xylem plugging that ultimately led to slow dieback.

Taxon
GrapevineVitist0
Organ / stage
xylem tissuee0
Interactor
Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporumPhaeomoniella chlamydosporat0pathogen
Outcome
slow diebacke0
Qualifier
Extensive plugginge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Vitis
Vitis · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Victor M. Vicente Selvas · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Grapevine in South Africa: Stress-Related Predisposition of Young Vines for Infection by Phaeoacremonium chlamydosporum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 16–135 · show in text ↑
e0

“Extensive plugging of the xylem tissue in inoculated plants was observed, eventually leading to slow dieback of these vines.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 475–599 · show in text ↑

inoculation · Phaeomoniella chlamydospora · VitisPositive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

drought · Phaeomoniella chlamydospora · VitisResults agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.