Paper · 2014

Positive effect of calcium on oxidative damage in maize seedling under chilling stress

Fan Wang

8
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The effect of calcium at different concentrations (0, 5, 10, 15 mmol·L-1 and 20 mmol·L-1) on physiological characteristics of maize seedling leaves under chilling stress was studied. The results showed that compared with the CK, the growth of maize seedling were inhibited and the accumulation of soluble protein and soluble sugar content were maintained , the antioxidant enzymes activities and proline content were reduced, whereas MDA content and membrane permeability were increased under chilling stress. The Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 showed mitigating effect of maintaining membrane permeability and the activities of SOD, POD and CAT, and promoting the accumulation of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein content in maize seedling. In addition, concentration of 10 mol·L-1 Ca2+ showed the largest positive influence on seedling growth.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling inhibited maize seedling growth relative to CK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
chilling stresst0
Outcome
growth of maize seedlinge0
Direction
inhibitede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared with the CK, the growth of maize seedling were inhibited”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–272 · show in text ↑
t0

“chilling stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 71–86 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling maintained soluble protein and soluble sugar content relative to CK.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chilling stresst0
Outcome
soluble protein and soluble sugar contente0
Direction
maintainede0
Comparator
CKt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the accumulation of soluble protein and soluble sugar content were maintained”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 277–354 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling under chilling stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“compared with the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling reduced antioxidant enzyme activities and proline content.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chilling stresst0
Outcome
antioxidant enzymes activities and proline contente0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
CKt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the antioxidant enzymes activities and proline content were reduced”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 357–424 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling under chilling stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“compared with the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chilling increased MDA content and membrane permeability.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
chilling stresse0
Outcome
MDA content and membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKt1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“MDA content and membrane permeability were increased under chilling stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 434–508 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling under chilling stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–86 · show in text ↑
t1

“compared with the CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 207–227 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium at 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 mitigated membrane permeability under chilling.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1e0
Outcome
membrane permeabilitye0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 showed mitigating effect of maintaining membrane permeability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–643 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium at 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 maintained SOD, POD and CAT activities.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1e0
Outcome
activities of SOD, POD and CATe0
Direction
maintaininge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 showed mitigating effect of maintaining membrane permeability and the activities of SOD, POD and CAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–682 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium at 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 promoted accumulation of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1e0
Outcome
proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein contente0
Direction
promotinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The Ca2+ treatment with the concentration ranging from 5 to 10 mmol·L-1 showed mitigating effect of maintaining membrane permeability and the activities of SOD, POD and CAT, and promoting the accumulation of proline, soluble sugar and soluble protein content in maize seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 510–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The stated 10 mol·L-1 Ca2+ concentration had the largest positive influence on seedling growth.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
concentration of 10 mol·L-1 Ca2+e0
Outcome
seedling growthe0
Direction
largest positive influencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“concentration of 10 mol·L-1 Ca2+ showed the largest positive influence on seedling growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–890 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize seedling”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–64 · show in text ↑

calcium(2+) · physiology: osmolytes · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

calcium(2+) · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

calcium(2+) · growth · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 14 positive, 3 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

calcium(2+) · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

cold · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

cold · growth · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

73 papers: 16 positive, 57 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

cold · physiology: oxidative · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 2 positive, 21 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.