Abstract
[Objective]The technical support of foliar-spraying for the improvement of tobacco leaf quality and yield in Shaoyang City,Hunan Province through the selection of the suitable fertilizer.[Method]The effect of four kinds of microbial agent foliars:Nongxueboshi I, Huaguosu,Duomeizi and Heyinfei,on tobacco growth and quality was studied.[Results]The four kinds of foliar spraying can be promote the tobacco seedling growth and development and the quality improvement in varying degrees in the period of tobacco growth,among which,the best effect was from Duomeizi,which could significantly improve the leaf structure,increase the content of water-soluble sugar and potassium and reduce the content of nitrogen,nicotine and chloride ion in tobacco leaf,coordinate the intrinsic chemical composition of tobacco leaf and improve the quality of sensory smoking,so that the tobacco quality was raised.[Conclusion]The foliar spraying could promote the tobacco growth and improve the tobacco quality and the treatment of Duomeizi could produce the best effect.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 6
Claim · model-written summary
The four foliar agents promoted tobacco seedling growth and quality to varying degrees.
- Taxon
- tobacco
Nicotiana tabacume0 - Treatment
- four kinds of foliar sprayinge0
- Outcome
- seedling growth and development and the quality improvemente0
- Direction
- promotee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The four kinds of foliar spraying can be promote the tobacco seedling growth and development and the quality improvement in varying degrees”
Claim · model-written summary
Duomeizi had the best overall effect.
- Taxon
- TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- Duomeizie0
- Outcome
- best effecte0
- Direction
- beste0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the best effect was from Duomeizi”
t0“Tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Duomeizi significantly improved tobacco leaf structure.
- Taxon
- TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- Duomeizie0
- Outcome
- leaf structuree0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Duomeizi,which could significantly improve the leaf structure”
t0“Tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Duomeizi increased water-soluble sugar and potassium content.
- Taxon
- TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- Duomeizie1
- Outcome
- content of water-soluble sugar and potassiume0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“increase the content of water-soluble sugar and potassium”
e1“best effect was from Duomeizi,which could significantly improve”
t0“Tobacco”
Claim · model-written summary
Duomeizi reduced nitrogen, nicotine and chloride-ion content.
- Taxon
- tobaccoNicotiana tabacume0
- Treatment
- Duomeizie1
- Outcome
- content of nitrogen,nicotine and chloride ione0
- Direction
- reducee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“reduce the content of nitrogen,nicotine and chloride ion in tobacco leaf”
e1“best effect was from Duomeizi,which could significantly improve”
Claim · model-written summary
Duomeizi improved sensory smoking quality.
- Taxon
- TobaccoNicotiana tabacumt0
- Treatment
- Duomeizie1
- Outcome
- quality of sensory smokinge0
- Direction
- improvee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“improve the quality of sensory smoking”
e1“best effect was from Duomeizi,which could significantly improve”
t0“Tobacco”
The same questions in other papers
application · quality: general · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree
27 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.