Abstract
This paper studies the effects of four kinds of plant growth regulators with different concentrations in Narcissus,which are PP_(333)、S3307、CCC and B_9 respectively. The results show that the height of Narcissus treated with certain concentration regulators can be dropped. The scapes of flower are shorter. And the leaves become smaller. Among the four regulators, the effects of PP_(333) and S3307 are better than the other two,although CCC and B_9 also have obvious activities to leaves and scapes.Not all of the four regulators show significant relationship with root length. The best concentration of PP_(333) and S3307 is 100 mg/L, and 300mg/L are suitable for the other two. At the same time, the flowering dates are all later for Narcissus treated than the control to a certain extent, and the range delayed is from 2 days to 19 days. The correlation analysis finds that there is significant correlation between the flowering dates and the concentrations of regulators. And the ornament value is higher for the compact、straight and coordinate plant got using different regulators.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 12
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulator treatment reduced Narcissus height.
NarcissusNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the height of Narcissus treated with certain concentration regulators can be dropped”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulator treatment shortened flower scapes.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The scapes of flower are shorter”
t0“Plant Growth Regulators in Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
Growth regulator treatment made leaves smaller.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“And the leaves become smaller”
t0“Plant Growth Regulators in Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
PP_(333) had better effects than CCC and B_9.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the effects of PP_(333) and S3307 are better than the other two,although CCC and B_9 also have obvious activities to leaves and scapes”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
S3307 had better effects than CCC and B_9.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the effects of PP_(333) and S3307 are better than the other two,although CCC and B_9 also have obvious activities to leaves and scapes”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
Regulator treatment did not always have a significant relation with root length.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Not all of the four regulators show significant relationship with root length”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
The best PP_(333) concentration was 100 mg/L.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best concentration of PP_(333) and S3307 is 100 mg/L”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
The best S3307 concentration was 100 mg/L.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The best concentration of PP_(333) and S3307 is 100 mg/L”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
A 300mg/L concentration was suitable for CCC.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“300mg/L are suitable for the other two”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
Regulators delayed flowering by 2 to 19 days versus control.
- Treatment
- treatede0
- Outcome
- flowering datese0
- Direction
- latere0
- Value
- 2 days to 19 dayse0
- Comparator
- controle0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the flowering dates are all later for Narcissus treated than the control to a certain extent, and the range delayed is from 2 days to 19 days”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering date was significantly correlated with regulator concentration.
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there is significant correlation between the flowering dates and the concentrations of regulators”
t0“Narcissus”
Claim · model-written summary
Regulator use yielded compact, straight plants with higher ornamental value.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the ornament value is higher for the compact、straight and coordinate plant got using different regulators”
t0“Narcissus”
The same questions in other papers
class · growth · NarcissusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.