Abstract
SUMMARY To study the effects of floral organs on scape growth of narcissus, the spathe, perianth parts, paracorolla, anthers and gynoecium were excised from the bud in all practicable combinations, and growth regulators were applied to decapitated scapes. Spathe removal induced earlier flowering, and by the third day after treatment had reduced scape growth to 88% of that of intact controls. The removal of other parts (alone or in combination) had no additional effects on scape growth, except for gynoecium removal which reduced growth to 43% of that of intact controls after 3 days. Scape growth continued in all treated plants, however, and by day 23 the decapitated plants had grown 79% as much as the intact controls. The effect of gynoecium removal could largely be replaced by applied auxin; gibberellic acid was partly effective in restoring scape growth.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Removing the spathe induced earlier flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Spathe removal induced earlier flowering”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing the spathe reduced scape growth to 88% of intact controls by day three.
- Treatment
- Spathe removale1
- Outcome
- scape growthe0
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 88%e0
- Qualifier
- third day after treatmente0
- Comparator
- intact controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“by the third day after treatment had reduced scape growth to 88% of that of intact controls”
e1“Spathe removal induced earlier flowering”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Removing other floral parts had no additional effect on scape growth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The removal of other parts (alone or in combination) had no additional effects on scape growth”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Gynoecium removal reduced scape growth to 43% of intact controls after three days.
- Treatment
- gynoecium removale0
- Outcome
- scape growthe1
- Direction
- reducede0
- Value
- 43%e0
- Comparator
- intact controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“gynoecium removal which reduced growth to 43% of that of intact controls after 3 days”
e1“additional effects on scape growth”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Scape growth continued in every treated plant.
- Outcome
- Scape growth continued in all treated plantse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Scape growth continued in all treated plants”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
By day 23, decapitated scapes reached 79% of intact-control growth.
- Treatment
- decapitated plantse0
- Outcome
- Scape growthe1
- Direction
- lowerinferrede0
- Value
- 79%e0
- Comparator
- intact controlse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“by day 23 the decapitated plants had grown 79% as much as the intact controls”
e1“Scape growth”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Applied auxin largely replaced the effect of gynoecium removal on scape growth.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“The effect of gynoecium removal could largely be replaced by applied auxin”
e1“effective in restoring scape growth”
t0“NARCISSUS”
Claim · model-written summary
Gibberellic acid partly restored scape growth.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“gibberellic acid was partly effective in restoring scape growth”
t0“NARCISSUS”
The same questions in other papers
Gibberellic acid · growth · NarcissusResults agree
1 paper in the same direction as this paper
- positive
class · growth · NarcissusResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.