Paper · 2005 · Northern Fruits

Study on the Control Efficiency of Fungicide for Mould Core in Yueshuai Apple

Jiamin Wang

3
claims
6
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The control efficiencies of four fungicides(Polyoxin,Thiophanate-methyl,Iprodione and Flusilazole)for apple mould core in Yueshuai were investigated in this study. The results showed that the control efficiencies calculated by disease index were higher than calculated by occurrence rate.The mixed application of polyoxin and iprodione sprayed four times(one week befor florescence,full-blown florescence,young fruit period after florescence and young fruit period about May.20th)showed the best control efficiency and it could reach 55.96%.The comparation among different treatments revealed that full-blown florescence was a crucial period for control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 3

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control efficiencies calculated from disease index were higher than those calculated from occurrence rate.

Outcome
control efficiencies calculated by disease indexe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
occurrence ratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the control efficiencies calculated by disease index were higher than calculated by occurrence rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–287 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four sprays of mixed polyoxin and iprodione gave the best apple mould core control efficiency, reaching 55.96%.

Treatment
mixed application of polyoxin and iprodione sprayed four timese0
Outcome
control efficiencye0
Direction
beste0
Value
55.96%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The mixed application of polyoxin and iprodione sprayed four times(one week befor florescence,full-blown florescence,young fruit period after florescence and young fruit period about May.20th)showed the best control efficiency and it could reach 55.96%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–540 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The comparison of treatments identified full bloom as a crucial control period.

Organ / stage
full-blown florescencee0
Outcome
crucial period for controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“full-blown florescence was a crucial period for control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 598–653 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–77 · show in text ↑

iprodione · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

polyoxin · control · Malus domestica (apple)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · control · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 25 positive, 4 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.